• Corpus ID: 152708811

Declarations of War and Authorizations for the Use of Military Force: Historical Background and Legal Implications

@inproceedings{Elsea2007DeclarationsOW,
  title={Declarations of War and Authorizations for the Use of Military Force: Historical Background and Legal Implications},
  author={Jennifer K. Elsea and Richard F. Grimmett},
  year={2007},
  url={https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:152708811}
}
This report provides historical background on the enactment of declarations of war and authorizations for the use of force and analyzes their legal effects under international and domestic law. It also sets forth their texts in two appendices. Because the statutes that confer standby authority on the President and the executive branch potentially play such a large role in an armed conflict to which the United States is a party, the report includes an extensive listing and summary of the… 

Tables from this paper

Farewell to arms: a plan for evaluating the 2001 authorization for use of military force and its alternatives

Abstract : On September 14, 2001, Congress passed the 2001 Authorization for Use of Military Force (AUMF). Over the past 13 years, the AUMF has served as the primary legal foundation for the use of

The Dismantling of the Rule of Law in the United States: Systematisation of Executive Impunity, Dispensation from Non-derogable Norms, and Perpetualisation of a Permanent State of Emergency

Scholars of human rights and constitutional law have described in great detail the abuses perpetrated by the armed forces and secret services of the United States in the context of the ‘war on

Unconstitutional War: Strategic Risk in the Age of Congressional Abdication

There is an imbalance of constitutional power across the branches of the US government. Congress has failed to preserve its constitutional privileges, specifically its sole authority to declare war.

Authorities for Military Operations Against Terrorist Groups: The State of the Debate and Options for Congress

Abstract : This report surveys the debate over the requirements for a new congressional authorization for the use of military force (AUMF). It captures the results of two workshops, an extensive

Does It Even Work? A Theoretical and Practical Evaluation of the War Powers Resolution

ABSTRACT The War Powers Resolution of 1973 represents a policy that attempts to fill a procedural gap in the Constitution, that is, a clear process by which the use of military force is authorized.

Commander in Chief Authority and the Original Intent of the Constitution

In the modern era, an imperial view of Presidential Command in Chief authority to use military force has taken hold. The imperial view holds that a President has nearly unlimited authority to use

The cultivation of collective judgment in the decision-making on war: the US Congress and contingently manifested war powers

Th e subject of parliamentary war powers has sparked debates of late. Th e role of the US Congress in making US foreign policy and in war-making has been the focus of numerous studies. Debates on the

An examination of overt offensive military operations outside of combat zones

Abstract : Under the leadership of the United States Special Operations Command (USSOCOM), the military is undergoing transformation to more effectively counter the asymmetric threat of non-state

The notion of “protracted armed conflict” in the Rome Statute and the termination of armed conflicts under international law: An analysis of select issues

Abstract Legal controversies and disagreements have arisen about the timing and duration of numerous contemporary armed conflicts, not least regarding how to discern precisely when those conflicts

Detention of American Citizens as Enemy Combatants

This report provides background information regarding the cases of two U.S. citizens deemed “enemy combatants,” Yaser Esam Hamdi, who has been returned to Saudi Arabia, and Jose Padilla, who remains

Terrorism and the Law of War: Trying Terrorists as War Criminals Before Military Commissions

Abstract : The purpose of this report is to identify some of the legal and practical implications of treating the terrorist acts as war crimes and of applying the law of war rather than criminal

Natural Resources

    H. Münch
    Environmental Science
  • 1988