Decision and experience: why don't we choose what makes us happy?

@article{Hsee2006DecisionAE,
  title={Decision and experience: why don't we choose what makes us happy?},
  author={Christopher K. Hsee and Reid Hastie},
  journal={Trends in Cognitive Sciences},
  year={2006},
  volume={10},
  pages={31-37}
}
  • C. Hsee, R. Hastie
  • Published 2006
  • Psychology, Medicine
  • Trends in Cognitive Sciences
Recent years have witnessed a growing interest among psychologists and other social scientists in subjective well-being and happiness. Here we review selected contributions to this development from the literature on behavioral-decision theory. In particular, we examine many, somewhat surprising, findings that show people systematically fail to predict or choose what maximizes their happiness, and we look at reasons why they fail to do so. These findings challenge a fundamental assumption that… Expand
Suboptimal Choices and the Need for Experienced Individual Well-Being in Economic Analysis
Standard economic analysis assumes that people make choices that maximise their utility. Yet both popular discourse and other fields assume that people sometimes fail to make optimal choices and thusExpand
When Wanting the Best Goes Right or Wrong
TLDR
Drawing from motivation research, it is shown that two motivational orientations, promotion focus and assessment mode, are both associated with the goal of wanting the best, yet assessment is related to the use of alternative search strategies. Expand
“Leaky” Rationality: How Research on Behavioral Decision Making Challenges Normative Standards of Rationality
  • Daniel J Keys, B. Schwartz
  • Psychology, Medicine
  • Perspectives on psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science
  • 2007
TLDR
It is argued that formal principles of rationality do not provide a good enough normative standard against which to assess decision making and what is needed is a substantive theory of rationality—one that takes subjective experience seriously, considers both direct and indirect consequences of particular decisions, considers how particular decisions fit into life as a whole, and considers the effects of decisions on others. Expand
Soft paternalism and subjective well-being: how happiness research could help the paternalist improve individuals’ well-being
Soft paternalists claim to respect individuals’ preferences by trying to nudge them towards actions that would satisfy said preferences if they were suitably informed and debiased. This paper arguesExpand
Is Happiness the Best Measure of Well- Being?
There is much discussion about using subjective well-being measures as inputs into a social welfare function, which will tell us how well societies are doing. But we have (many) more than one measureExpand
Motivational Reasons for Biased Decisions: The Sunk-Cost Effect’s Instrumental Rationality
TLDR
The mechanism of need regulation, which accompanies the so-called “biased” decisions, is described and the application of the label “irrational” for biased decisions is discussed and reasons for instrumental rationality are proposed, which exist at an unconscious, need-regulative level. Expand
How Costs Influence Decision Values for Mixed Outcomes
TLDR
A selective review of relevant neurobiological work from a computational perspective, focusing on those studies that illuminate the underlying valuation mechanisms, and proposes two key assays that go beyond goodness of fit for deciding between the dominant additive model and four varieties of interactive models. Expand
The Pursuit of Unhappiness
Modern reflection about the good life and the good society has been dominated by a spirit of liberal optimism, according to which people typically know what's good for them and make prudent choicesExpand
Getting the Most for the Money: The Hedonic Return on Experiential and Material Purchases
Consumers everywhere are faced with the same dilemma: given limited resources, what sorts of purchases are most likely to produce lasting happiness and satisfaction? Put simply, how do you get theExpand
“I want to break free!” How experiences of freedom foster consumer happiness
Abstract This research investigates the relevance, characteristics, and influence of experiences of freedom as a source of consumer happiness. A qualitative study (Study 1) underscores the existenceExpand
...
1
2
3
4
5
...

References

SHOWING 1-10 OF 81 REFERENCES
When choice is demotivating: can one desire too much of a good thing?
TLDR
Experimental studies show that people are more likely to purchase gourmet jams or chocolates or to undertake optional class essay assignments when offered a limited array of 6 choices rather than a more extensive array of 24 or 30 choices. Expand
Lay Rationalism and Inconsistency between Predicted Experience and Decision
Decision-makers are sometimes depicted as impulsive and overly influenced by hot,affective factors. The present research suggests that decision-makers may be too cold and overly focus onExpand
Anticipated Emotions as Guides to Choice
When making decisions, people often anticipate the emotions they might experience as a result of the outcomes of their choices. In the process, they simulate what life would be like with one outcomeExpand
Choice and the relative pleasure of consequences.
  • B. Mellers
  • Psychology, Medicine
  • Psychological bulletin
  • 2000
TLDR
Attempts to model pleasure and pain in terms of utilities, decision weights, and counterfactual comparisons are examined. Expand
Conflict and Tradeoffs in Decision Making
What makes some decisions easy and others difficult? Research in judgment and decision making indicates that conflict plays a decisive role in decision-making processes. The essays in this bookExpand
Happiness: Lessons from a New Science
In this new edition of his landmark book, Richard Layard shows that there is a paradox at the heart of our lives. Most people want more income. Yet as societies become richer, they do not becomeExpand
Choices, Values, and Frames
We discuss the cognitive and the psy- chophysical determinants of choice in risky and risk- less contexts. The psychophysics of value induce risk aversion in the domain of gains and risk seeking inExpand
Predicting a changing taste: Do people know what they will like?
A distinction is made between decision utility, experienced utility, and predicted utility and an experiment is reported addressing people's ability to forecast experienced utility. Subjects in twoExpand
Risk as Feelings
TLDR
It is shown that emotional reactions to risky situations often diverge from cognitive assessments of those risks, and when such divergence occurs, emotional reactions often drive behavior. Expand
The illusion of courage in social predictions: Underestimating the impact of fear of embarrassment on other people !
The results of two experiments support the thesis that emotional perspective taking entails two judgments: a prediction of one’s own preferences and decisions in a diVerent emotional situation, andExpand
...
1
2
3
4
5
...