Decision analysis using targets instead of utility functions

@article{Bordley2000DecisionAU,
  title={Decision analysis using targets instead of utility functions},
  author={Robert F. Bordley and Marco LiCalzi},
  journal={Decisions in Economics and Finance},
  year={2000},
  volume={23},
  pages={53-74}
}
Abstract.A common precept of decision analysis under uncertainty is the choice of an action which maximizes the expected value of a utility function. Savage's (1954) axioms for subjective expected utility provide a normative foundation for this principle of choice. This paper shows that the same set of axioms implies that one should select an action which maximizes the probability of meeting an uncertain target. This suggests a new perspective and an alternate target-based language for decision… 
Normative target-based decision making
This paper relates normative expected-utility decision making to target-based decision making, and introduces a new quantity, the aspiration equivalent. We show that using the aspiration equivalent
Utility Function Induced by Fuzzy Target in Probabilistic Decision Making
TLDR
The issue of how to bring fuzzy targets within the reach of the target-based model for a class of decision making under uncertainty problems is discussed and two methods for inducing utility functions from fuzzy targets are discussed.
A language for the construction of preferences under uncertainty
This paper studies a target-based procedure to rank lotteries that is normatively and observationally equivalent to the expected utility model. In view of this equivalence, the traditional
Decision Support The Pearson system of utility functions
TLDR
A parametric family of utility functions for decision analysis that embeds the HARA class in a four-parameter representation for the risk aversion function, which makes the family suited for both expected utility and prospect theory.
Aspiration Level, Probability of Success and Failure, and Expected Utility
Aspiration levels are a relevant aspect of decision making. We develop a model that includes the overall probabilities of success and failure relative to the aspiration level into an expected utility
Robust decision making over a set of random targets or risk-averse utilities with an application to portfolio optimization
In many situations, decision-makers need to exceed a random target or make decisions using expected utilities. These two situations are equivalent when a decision-maker’s utility function is
Range-Dependent Utility
TLDR
Range-dependent utility enables experimental results to be explained without recourse to the probability weighting function and shows that range-dependent utilities can be normalized to obtain decision utility - a single utility function able to describe decisions involving lotteries defned over diferent ranges.
Robust decision making using a general utility set
Target-Oriented Decision Analysis with Different Target Preferences
TLDR
Two methods have been proposed to model the different types of target preferences: cumulative distribution function (cdf) based method and level set based method, which can both induce four shaped value functions: S - shaped, inverse S -shaped, convex, and concave, which represents decision maker's psychological preference.
The Pearson system of utility functions
...
...

References

SHOWING 1-10 OF 39 REFERENCES
A language for the construction of preferences under uncertainty
This paper studies a target-based procedure to rank lotteries that is normatively and observationally equivalent to the expected utility model. In view of this equivalence, the traditional
The Impossibility of Bayesian Group Decision Making with Separate Aggregation of Beliefs and Values
2Bayesian paradigm. Following it, probability assessments and utility functions are defined independently. It seems reasonable to suggest that groups adopt a similar approach.3 That is, the group
Decisions with Multiple Objectives: Preferences and Value Trade-Offs
TLDR
This book describes how a confused decision maker, who wishes to make a reasonable and responsible choice among alternatives, can systematically probe his true feelings in order to make those critically important, vexing trade-offs between incommensurable objectives.
Ordinal utility models of decision making under uncertainty
This paper studies two models of rational behavior under uncertainty whose predictions are invariant under ordinal transformations of utility. The ‘quantile utility’ model assumes that the agent
State-Dependent Utilities
Several axiom systems for preference among acts lead to the existence of a unique probability and a state-independent utility such that acts are ranked according to their expected utilities. These
Expected utility without utility
This paper advances an interpretation of Von Neumann-Morgenstern's expected utility model for preferences over lotteries which does not require the notion of a cardinal utility over prizes and can be
Equity and the Informational Basis of Collective Choice
We consider the problem of a planner or ethical observer who wants to derive a collective preference ordering over a set of feasible alternatives from the knowledge of individual utility functions.
Utility theory for decision making
Abstract : The book presents a concise yet mathematically complete treatment of modern utility theories that covers nonprobabilistic preference theory, the von Neumann-Morgenstern expected-utility
The Use of Distribution Functions to Represent Utility Functions
This paper considers the decision maker whose evaluation and consequent choice of actions is accomplished through the use of the expected utility hypothesis. In cases where the utility function is
A Group Preference Axiomatization with Cardinal Utility
Given a group composed of N individuals and given that each has rated all of the alternatives using a cardinal utility function, the problem is to aggregate these to obtain a group cardinal utility
...
...