Decision analysis using targets instead of utility functions

  title={Decision analysis using targets instead of utility functions},
  author={Robert F. Bordley and Marco LiCalzi},
  journal={Decisions in Economics and Finance},
Abstract.A common precept of decision analysis under uncertainty is the choice of an action which maximizes the expected value of a utility function. Savage's (1954) axioms for subjective expected utility provide a normative foundation for this principle of choice. This paper shows that the same set of axioms implies that one should select an action which maximizes the probability of meeting an uncertain target. This suggests a new perspective and an alternate target-based language for decision… 

Normative target-based decision making

This paper relates normative expected-utility decision making to target-based decision making, and introduces a new quantity, the aspiration equivalent. We show that using the aspiration equivalent

Decision Support The Pearson system of utility functions

A parametric family of utility functions for decision analysis that embeds the HARA class in a four-parameter representation for the risk aversion function, which makes the family suited for both expected utility and prospect theory.

Aspiration Level, Probability of Success and Failure, and Expected Utility

Aspiration levels are a relevant aspect of decision making. We develop a model that includes the overall probabilities of success and failure relative to the aspiration level into an expected utility

Robust decision making over a set of random targets or risk-averse utilities with an application to portfolio optimization

In many situations, decision-makers need to exceed a random target or make decisions using expected utilities. These two situations are equivalent when a decision-maker’s utility function is

Range-Dependent Utility

Range-dependent utility enables experimental results to be explained without recourse to the probability weighting function and shows that range-dependent utilities can be normalized to obtain decision utility - a single utility function able to describe decisions involving lotteries defned over diferent ranges.

Robust decision making using a general utility set

Target-Oriented Decision Analysis with Different Target Preferences

Two methods have been proposed to model the different types of target preferences: cumulative distribution function (cdf) based method and level set based method, which can both induce four shaped value functions: S - shaped, inverse S -shaped, convex, and concave, which represents decision maker's psychological preference.

Applying the Benchmarking Procedure: A Decision Criterion of Choice Under Risk

Modeling risk in a prescriptively plausible way represents a major issue in decision theory. The benchmarking procedure, being based on the satisficing principle and providing a probabilistic

Optimizing fixed targets in organizations through simulation

A simulation-based model uses a copula based method to quantify the value gap that results from target-based behavior in relation to utility maximizing behavior and shows that the optimal target decreases as the risk aversion increases, increases as the number of available alternatives increase, and reduces as the alternatives approach some efficient frontier.



The Impossibility of Bayesian Group Decision Making with Separate Aggregation of Beliefs and Values

2Bayesian paradigm. Following it, probability assessments and utility functions are defined independently. It seems reasonable to suggest that groups adopt a similar approach.3 That is, the group

Decisions with Multiple Objectives: Preferences and Value Trade-Offs

This book describes how a confused decision maker, who wishes to make a reasonable and responsible choice among alternatives, can systematically probe his true feelings in order to make those critically important, vexing trade-offs between incommensurable objectives.

Ordinal utility models of decision making under uncertainty

This paper studies two models of rational behavior under uncertainty whose predictions are invariant under ordinal transformations of utility. The ‘quantile utility’ model assumes that the agent

Prospect theory: analysis of decision under risk

Analysis of decision making under risk has been dominated by expected utility theory, which generally accounts for people's actions. Presents a critique of expected utility theory as a descriptive

State-Dependent Utilities

Several axiom systems for preference among acts lead to the existence of a unique probability and a state-independent utility such that acts are ranked according to their expected utilities. These

Expected utility without utility

This paper advances an interpretation of Von Neumann-Morgenstern's expected utility model for preferences over lotteries which does not require the notion of a cardinal utility over prizes and can be

Equity and the Informational Basis of Collective Choice

We consider the problem of a planner or ethical observer who wants to derive a collective preference ordering over a set of feasible alternatives from the knowledge of individual utility functions.

Risk Sharing and Group Decision Making

In a decision-making problem where a group will receive an uncertain payoff which must be divided among the members of the group, the ultimate payoff of interest is the vector of individual payoffs

The Use of Distribution Functions to Represent Utility Functions

This paper considers the decision maker whose evaluation and consequent choice of actions is accomplished through the use of the expected utility hypothesis. In cases where the utility function is

A Group Preference Axiomatization with Cardinal Utility

Given a group composed of N individuals and given that each has rated all of the alternatives using a cardinal utility function, the problem is to aggregate these to obtain a group cardinal utility