Deciding versus Reacting: Conceptions of Moral Judgment and the Reason-Affect Debate

@article{Monin2007DecidingVR,
  title={Deciding versus Reacting: Conceptions of Moral Judgment and the Reason-Affect Debate},
  author={Benoit Monin and David A Pizarro and Jennifer S. Beer},
  journal={Review of General Psychology},
  year={2007},
  volume={11},
  pages={111 - 99}
}
Recent approaches to moral judgment have typically pitted emotion against reason. In an effort to move beyond this debate, we propose that authors presenting diverging models are considering quite different prototypical situations: those focusing on the resolution of complex dilemmas conclude that morality involves sophisticated reasoning, whereas those studying reactions to shocking moral violations find that morality involves quick, affect-laden processes. We articulate these diverging… 

How Does Reasoning (Fail to) Contribute to Moral Judgment? Dumbfounding and Disengagement

Recent experiments in moral psychology have been taken to imply that moral reasoning only serves to reaffirm prior moral intuitions. More specifically, Jonathan Haidt concludes from his moral

University of Groningen How Does Reasoning (Fail to) Contribute to Moral Judgment? Dumbfounding and Disengagement Hindriks, Frank

Recent experiments inmoral psychology have been taken to imply that moral reasoning only serves to reaffirm prior moral intuitions. More specifically, Jonathan Haidt concludes from his moral

Holier than me? Threatening Social Comparison in the Moral Domain

This short review analyzes the specificity of upward social comparison in the moral domain, suggesting that it blends Festinger’s (1954) distinction between opinions and abilities. We discuss

With a Clean Conscience

TLDR
The findings support the idea that moral judgment can be driven by intuitive processes, rather than deliberate reasoning, and one of those intuitions appears to be physical purity, because it has a strong connection to moral purity.

How Quick Decisions Illuminate Moral Character

It has been suggested that people attend to others’ actions in the service of forming impressions of their underlying dispositions. If so, it follows that in considering others’ morally relevant

Moral Intuition

In contrast to older, conventional accounts that treat ethical decision making and behavior as the result of deliberative and intendedly rational processes, a rapidly growing body of social science

Motivated Moral Reasoning

Moral judgments are important, intuitive, and complex. These factors make moral judgment particularly fertile ground for motivated reasoning. This chapter reviews research (both our own and that of

Motivated Moral Reasoning

Moral judgments are important, intuitive, and complex. These factors make moral judgment particularly fertile ground for motivated reasoning. This chapter reviews research (both our own and that of

Moral Conviction 1 Running Head : MORAL CONVICTION In the Mind of the Perceiver : Psychological Implications of Moral Conviction

Moral conviction is a subjective assessment that one’s attitude about a specific issue or situation is associated with one’s core moral beliefs and fundamental sense of right or wrong. A growing body
...

References

SHOWING 1-10 OF 89 REFERENCES

An fMRI Investigation of Emotional Engagement in Moral Judgment

TLDR
It is argued that moral dilemmas vary systematically in the extent to which they engage emotional processing and that these variations in emotional engagement influence moral judgment.

Toward a more pragmatic approach to morality: a critical evaluation of Kohlberg's model.

TLDR
The authors outline in 11 propositions a framework for a new approach that is more attentive to the purposes that people use morality to achieve, and introduce a more pragmatic approach.

The intelligence of the moral intuitions: comment on Haidt (2001).

TLDR
There is considerable evidence from outside the laboratory that people actively engage in reasoning when faced with real-world moral dilemmas, which limits the strong claims of the social intuitionist model concerning the irrelevance of conscious deliberation.

The Psychology of Doing Nothing: Forms of Decision Avoidance Result from Reason and Emotion

  • C. Anderson
  • Business, Psychology
    Psychological bulletin
  • 2003
TLDR
Findings are related by common antecedents and consequences in a rational-emotional model of the factors that predispose humans to do nothing: choice deferral, status quo bias, omission bias, and inaction inertia.

Affect, culture, and morality, or is it wrong to eat your dog?

TLDR
For Brazilian and U.S. adults and children of high and low socioeconomic status, moral judgments were better predicted by affective reactions than by appraisals of harmfulness and suggestions are made for building cross-culturally valid models of moral judgment.

The emotional dog and its rational tail: a social intuitionist approach to moral judgment.

  • J. Haidt
  • Psychology
    Psychological review
  • 2001
TLDR
The author gives 4 reasons for considering the hypothesis that moral reasoning does not cause moral judgment; rather, moral reasoning is usually a post hoc construction, generated after a judgment has been reached.

Bridging Moral Cognition and Moral Action: A Critical Review of the Literature.

Discusses conceptual and empirical issues concerning the relations between moral reasoning and moral action. Two opposite views of the relations between moral cognition and moral action are

The psychology of the unthinkable: taboo trade-offs, forbidden base rates, and heretical counterfactuals.

TLDR
Although the results fit the sacred-value-protection model (SVPM) better than rival formulations, the SVPM must draw on cross-cultural taxonomies of relational schemata to specify normative boundaries on thought.

The emotional dog does learn new tricks: A reply to Pizarro and Bloom (2003).

A critique and reply are most productive when the authors on both sides share some areas of agreement and a sense of mutual respect. I am very fortunate that the present exchange seems likely to be
...