Deciding versus Reacting: Conceptions of Moral Judgment and the Reason-Affect Debate

@article{Monin2007DecidingVR,
  title={Deciding versus Reacting: Conceptions of Moral Judgment and the Reason-Affect Debate},
  author={Benoit Monin and David A Pizarro and Jennifer S. Beer},
  journal={Review of General Psychology},
  year={2007},
  volume={11},
  pages={111 - 99}
}
Recent approaches to moral judgment have typically pitted emotion against reason. In an effort to move beyond this debate, we propose that authors presenting diverging models are considering quite different prototypical situations: those focusing on the resolution of complex dilemmas conclude that morality involves sophisticated reasoning, whereas those studying reactions to shocking moral violations find that morality involves quick, affect-laden processes. We articulate these diverging… Expand
University of Groningen How Does Reasoning (Fail to) Contribute to Moral Judgment? Dumbfounding and Disengagement Hindriks, Frank
Recent experiments inmoral psychology have been taken to imply that moral reasoning only serves to reaffirm prior moral intuitions. More specifically, Jonathan Haidt concludes from his moralExpand
How Does Reasoning (Fail to) Contribute to Moral Judgment? Dumbfounding and Disengagement
Recent experiments in moral psychology have been taken to imply that moral reasoning only serves to reaffirm prior moral intuitions. More specifically, Jonathan Haidt concludes from his moralExpand
Holier than me? Threatening Social Comparison in the Moral Domain
This short review analyzes the specificity of upward social comparison in the moral domain, suggesting that it blends Festinger’s (1954) distinction between opinions and abilities. We discussExpand
With a Clean Conscience
TLDR
The findings support the idea that moral judgment can be driven by intuitive processes, rather than deliberate reasoning, and one of those intuitions appears to be physical purity, because it has a strong connection to moral purity. Expand
Chapter 11 In the Mind of the Perceiver: Psychological Implications of Moral Conviction
Abstract Moral conviction is a subjective assessment that one's attitude about a specific issue or situation is associated with one's core moral beliefs and fundamental sense of right or wrong. AExpand
How Quick Decisions Illuminate Moral Character
It has been suggested that people attend to others’ actions in the service of forming impressions of their underlying dispositions. If so, it follows that in considering others’ morally relevantExpand
Moral Intuition
In contrast to older, conventional accounts that treat ethical decision making and behavior as the result of deliberative and intendedly rational processes, a rapidly growing body of social scienceExpand
Motivated Moral Reasoning
Moral judgments are important, intuitive, and complex. These factors make moral judgment particularly fertile ground for motivated reasoning. This chapter reviews research (both our own and that ofExpand
Motivated Moral Reasoning
Moral judgments are important, intuitive, and complex. These factors make moral judgment particularly fertile ground for motivated reasoning. This chapter reviews research (both our own and that ofExpand
Moral Conviction 1 Running Head : MORAL CONVICTION In the Mind of the Perceiver : Psychological Implications of Moral Conviction
Moral conviction is a subjective assessment that one’s attitude about a specific issue or situation is associated with one’s core moral beliefs and fundamental sense of right or wrong. A growing bodyExpand
...
1
2
3
4
5
...

References

SHOWING 1-10 OF 103 REFERENCES
An fMRI Investigation of Emotional Engagement in Moral Judgment
TLDR
It is argued that moral dilemmas vary systematically in the extent to which they engage emotional processing and that these variations in emotional engagement influence moral judgment. Expand
Toward a more pragmatic approach to morality: a critical evaluation of Kohlberg's model.
TLDR
The authors outline in 11 propositions a framework for a new approach that is more attentive to the purposes that people use morality to achieve, and introduce a more pragmatic approach. Expand
Asymmetry in Judgments of Moral Blame and Praise
TLDR
Three experiments investigated judgments of moral blame and praise elicited when individuals were presented with vignettes describing actions that were performed either carefully and deliberately or impulsively and uncontrollably. Expand
The intelligence of the moral intuitions: comment on Haidt (2001).
TLDR
There is considerable evidence from outside the laboratory that people actively engage in reasoning when faced with real-world moral dilemmas, which limits the strong claims of the social intuitionist model concerning the irrelevance of conscious deliberation. Expand
How (and where) does moral judgment work?
TLDR
Findings in psychology and cognitive neuroscience indicate the importance of affect, although they allow that reasoning can play a restricted but significant role in moral judgment, and point towards a preliminary account of the functional neuroanatomy of moral judgment. Expand
The Psychology of Doing Nothing: Forms of Decision Avoidance Result from Reason and Emotion
  • C. Anderson
  • Psychology, Medicine
  • Psychological bulletin
  • 2003
TLDR
Findings are related by common antecedents and consequences in a rational-emotional model of the factors that predispose humans to do nothing: choice deferral, status quo bias, omission bias, and inaction inertia. Expand
Affect, culture, and morality, or is it wrong to eat your dog?
TLDR
For Brazilian and U.S. adults and children of high and low socioeconomic status, moral judgments were better predicted by affective reactions than by appraisals of harmfulness and suggestions are made for building cross-culturally valid models of moral judgment. Expand
The emotional dog and its rational tail: a social intuitionist approach to moral judgment.
  • J. Haidt
  • Medicine, Psychology
  • Psychological review
  • 2001
TLDR
The author gives 4 reasons for considering the hypothesis that moral reasoning does not cause moral judgment; rather, moral reasoning is usually a post hoc construction, generated after a judgment has been reached. Expand
The Neural Bases of Cognitive Conflict and Control in Moral Judgment
TLDR
The present results indicate that brain regions associated with abstract reasoning and cognitive control are recruited to resolve difficult personal moral dilemmas in which utilitarian values require "personal" moral violations, violations that have previously been associated with increased activity in emotion-related brain regions. Expand
Risk as Feelings
TLDR
It is shown that emotional reactions to risky situations often diverge from cognitive assessments of those risks, and when such divergence occurs, emotional reactions often drive behavior. Expand
...
1
2
3
4
5
...