Debiasing Decisions

  title={Debiasing Decisions},
  author={Carey K. Morewedge and Haewon Yoon and Irene Scopelliti and Carl Symborski and James Korris and Karim S. Kassam},
  journal={Policy Insights from the Behavioral and Brain Sciences},
  pages={129 - 140}
From failures of intelligence analysis to misguided beliefs about vaccinations, biased judgment and decision making contributes to problems in policy, business, medicine, law, education, and private life. Early attempts to reduce decision biases with training met with little success, leading scientists and policy makers to focus on debiasing by using incentives and changes in the presentation and elicitation of decisions. We report the results of two longitudinal experiments that found medium… 

Figures from this paper

Debiasing Training Improves Decision Making in the Field

Analysis of case write-ups suggests that a reduction in confirmatory hypothesis testing accounts for graduate students’ improved decision making in the case.

Debiasing in a Minute or Less, or Too Good to Be True? The Effect of Micro-Interventions on Decision-Making Quality

In this study, the effects of a novel debiasing micro-intervention (an intervention that requires no training or instructions) are tested in three experiments. The intervention is epistemologically

Running head: DEBIASING TRAINING TRANSFERS TO THE FIELD Debiasing Training Transfers to Improve Decision Making in the Field

The primary objection to debiasing training interventions is a lack of evidence that they transfer to improve decision making in field settings, where reminders of bias are absent. We gave graduate

The psychology of experimental psychologists: Overcoming cognitive constraints to improve research: The 47th Sir Frederic Bartlett Lecture

  • D. Bishop
  • Psychology
    Quarterly journal of experimental psychology
  • 2019
It is argued that if proposed solutions to the replication crisis are to be effective, they need to take into account human cognitive constraints that can distort all stages of the research process, including design and execution of experiments, analysis of data, and writing up findings for publication.

Confronting bias in judging: A framework for addressing psychological biases in decision making

Cognitive biases are systematic tendencies of thought which undermine accurate or fair reasoning. An allied concept is that of ‘implicit bias’, which are biases directed at members of particular

Retention and Transfer of Cognitive Bias Mitigation Interventions: A Systematic Literature Study

Cognitive biases can adversely affect human judgment and decision making and should therefore preferably be mitigated, so that we can achieve our goals as effectively as possible. Hence, numerous

The debiasing effect of counterfactuals

People are not fully rational and their decisions are affected by factors such as situational context, emotions, and cognitive capacity. Often, the decision-making situation is unclear, and we do not



On avoiding framing effects in experienced decision makers

Examination of the effect of positive–negative framing on experienced criminal justice decision makers found the technique was perceived to be more accurate and was more likely to be recommended when its effectiveness was presented in a positive than in a negative frame.

Bias Blind Spot: Structure, Measurement, and Consequences

The development and validation of an instrument to measure individual differences in the propensity to exhibit the bias blind spot that is unidimensional, internally consistent, has high test-retest reliability, and is discriminated from measures of intelligence, decision-making ability, and personality traits related to self-esteem, self-enhancement, and self-presentation are reported.

Decision-making Competence: External Validation through an Individual-differences Approach.

This study asks to what extent (a) individuals show consistent performance differences across typical behavioral decision-making tasks, and (b) how those differences correlate with plausible

Test, Learn, Adapt: Developing Public Policy with Randomised Controlled Trials | Cabinet Office

The paper argues that Randomised Controlled Trials (RCTs), which are now widely used in medicine, international development, and internet-based businesses, should be used much more extensively in public policy.

Giving Debiasing Away: Can Psychological Research on Correcting Cognitive Errors Promote Human Welfare?

It is argued that research on combating extreme confirmation bias should be among psychological science's most pressing priorities.

When and Why Incentives (Don't) Work to Modify Behavior

First we discuss how extrinsic incentives may come into conflict with other motivations. For example, monetary incentives from principals may change how tasks are perceived by agents, with negative

Psychological Frictions and the Incomplete Take-Up of Social Benefits: Evidence from an IRS Field Experiment

We address the role of “psychological frictions” in the incomplete take-up of EITC benefits with an IRS field experiment. We specifically assess the influence of program confusion, informational

Sensible reasoning: A hypothesis about hypotheses.

TsCHmcI, JUDrTH E. Sensible Reasoning: A Hypothesis about Hypotheses. CHILD DEVELOPMENT, 1980, 51, 1-10. This study investigated the asserted differences in reasoning between adults and second,

How Can Decision Making Be Improved?

This article argues that the time has come to focus attention on the search for strategies that will improve bounded judgment because decision-making errors are costly and are growing more costly, decision makers are receptive, and academic insights are sure to follow from research on improvement.

Theory-based bias correction in dispositional inference: The fundamental attribution error is dead, long live the correspondence bias

Social psychological research has repeatedly shown that perceivers draw correspondent dispositional inferences from observed behaviour even when this behaviour was highly constrained by situational