Debating the Future of the European Court of Human Rights after the Interlaken Conference: Two Innovative Proposals

@article{Keller2010DebatingTF,
  title={Debating the Future of the European Court of Human Rights after the Interlaken Conference: Two Innovative Proposals},
  author={Helen Rex Keller and Andreas M. Fischer and Daniela K{\"u}hne},
  journal={European Journal of International Law},
  year={2010},
  volume={21},
  pages={1025-1048}
}
The purpose of this article is to give new impetus to the topical debate on reforming the ECHR in the wake of the Interlaken Conference, at which the ECHR states parties agreed on a roadmap for the future evolution of the Convention system. We highlight two issues which have so far been underexposed in the literature. First, reform measures relating to the new admissibility criterion, just satisfaction, and the pilot judgment procedure are only partially promising, because they are premised on… 
19 Citations
Access to justice in the European Convention on Human Rights system
The numerous reforms to the Convention system of the past two decades have unquestionably had an effect on applicants’ means to access justice in the system. It is, however, open to question how
STRATEGIC ADMISSIBILITY DECISIONS IN THE EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS
  • Lewis Graham
  • Law, Business
    International and Comparative Law Quarterly
  • 2020
Abstract The current relationship between UK and Strasbourg is politically fraught, which presents inevitable challenges for both jurisdictions. This article will analyse how the Strasbourg Court has
THE ADMISSIBILITY CRITERION UNDER ARTICLE 35(3)(b) ECHR: A ‘SIGNIFICANT DISADVANTAGE’ TO HUMAN RIGHTS PROTECTION?
  • N. Vogiatzis
  • Law
    International and Comparative Law Quarterly
  • 2016
Abstract The purpose of this contribution is to provide a critical overview of issues of principle related to the ‘significant disadvantage’ admissibility criterion under 35(3)(b) ECHR, in light of
Germany’s Dialogue with Strasbourg: Extrapolating the Bundesverfassungsgericht’s Relationship with the European Court of Human Rights in the Preventive Detention Decision
Much is and has been written on the relationship between the German Federal Constitutional Court (Bundesverfassungsgericht) and the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR). According to its findings
Europos Žmogaus Teisių Teismas – konstitucinė justicija prieš individualią?
The European Court of Human Rights (hereafter – the Court) is considered as the most successful guarantee of individual justice in the world. At the same time, the price of its success is high –
Application of Legal Entities to the European Court of Human Rights: a Significant Disadvantage as the Condition of Admissibility
  • L. Deshko
  • Law
    Croatian International Relations Review
  • 2018
Abstract This article lists the content and deals with the criteria for assessing the presence or absence of material damage suffered by the applicant to the European Court of Human Rights, the
Reforming the State from Afar: Structural Reform Litigation at the Human Rights Courts
During the 1950s and 1960, landmark rulings ordering school desegregation and other structural changes transformed civil litigation in the United States. The most striking feature of the new model of
Dismantling the Iron-Cage: the Discursive Persistence and Legal Failure of a “Bureaucratic Rational” Construction of the Admissibility Decision-Making of the European Court of Human Rights
Over the last decade, the admissibility decision-making of the European Court of Human Rights has been the focus of considerable attention in the analysis of the “mounting pressure on the Convention
Reforming the State from Afar: Structural Reform Litigation at the Human Rights Courts
I. THE EVOLUTION OF HuMAN RIGHTS LITIGATION ..................................................................... 5 A . The Classic Declaratory M odel
...
...