Debate Another peep behind the veil

Abstract

Harris argues that ifQALYs are used only 50% of the population will be eligible for survival, whereas if random methods of allocation are used 100% will be eligible. We argue that this involves an equivocation in the use of "eligible", and provides no support for the random method. There is no advantage in having a 100% chance of being "eligible" for… (More)

Cite this paper

@inproceedings{Kuhse2006DebateAP, title={Debate Another peep behind the veil}, author={Helga Kuhse and Jeffrey Richardson}, year={2006} }