Darwinism in disguise? A comparison between Bohr's view on quantum mechanics and QBism

@article{Faye2016DarwinismID,
  title={Darwinism in disguise? A comparison between Bohr's view on quantum mechanics and QBism},
  author={Jan Faye},
  journal={Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences},
  year={2016},
  volume={374}
}
  • J. Faye
  • Published 28 May 2016
  • Philosophy
  • Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences
The Copenhagen interpretation is first and foremost associated with Niels Bohr's philosophy of quantum mechanics. In this paper, I attempt to lay out what I see as Bohr's pragmatic approach to science in general and to quantum physics in particular. A part of this approach is his claim that the classical concepts are indispensable for our understanding of all physical phenomena, and it seems as if the claim is grounded in his reflection upon how the evolution of language is adapted to… 
Evolutionary Processes in Quantum Decision Theory
TLDR
The review presents the basics of quantum decision theory, with an emphasis on temporary processes in decision making, and explains how an operationally-testable, rational choice between alternatives differs from a choice decorated by irrational feelings.
Reconsidering Knowledge, or, Coming to Terms With Quantum Mechanics
In conclusion of the previous chapter, we argued that the strong involvement of probabilities in the formalism of QM and the fact that one is not bound to introducing (formally explicit) hidden
Preface of the special issue quantum foundations: information approach
  • G. D’Ariano, A. Khrennikov
  • Physics
    Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences
  • 2016
This special issue is based on the contributions of a group of top experts in quantum foundations and quantum information and probability. It enlightens a number of interpretational, mathematical and
Quantum Mechanics Between Ontology and Epistemology

References

SHOWING 1-10 OF 24 REFERENCES
Why QBism Is Not the Copenhagen Interpretation and What John Bell Might Have Thought of It
Christopher Fuchs and Rudiger Schack have developed a way of understanding science, which, among other things, resolves many of the conceptual puzzles of quantum mechanics that have vexed people for
Niels Bohr: His Heritage and Legacy: An Anti-Realist View of Quantum Mechanics
I: Hoffding as Mentor.- I.- 1. Harald Hoffding, His Life and Thought.- 2. Hoffding and Bohr Senior.- II.- 1. The Ekliptika Circle.- 2. Bohr and William James.- 3. Bohr and Kierkegaard.- 4. The
QBism and the Greeks: why a quantum state does not represent an element of physical reality
In QBism (or quantum Bayesianism) a quantum state does not represent an element of physical reality but an agentʼs personal probability assignments, reflecting his subjective degrees of belief about
The Anti-Vaxjo Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics
In this note, I try to accomplish two things. First, I fulfill Andrei Khrennikov's request that I comment on his "Vaxjo Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics," contrasting it with my own present view
Natural Philosophy and Human Cultures
TLDR
The new lesson which has been impressed upon physicists regarding the caution with which all usual conventions must be applied as soon as the authors are not concerned with everyday experience may be suited to remind us in a novel way of the dangers of judging from their own point of view cultures developed within other societies.
PHILOSOPHY AND THE SCIENTIFIC IMAGE OF MAN
THE aim of philosophy, abstractly formulated, is to understand how things in the broadest possible sense of the term hang together in the broadest possible sense of the term. Under 'things in the
The Quantum Postulate and the Recent Development of Atomic Theory
IN connexion with the discussion of the physical interpretation of the quantum theoretical methods developed during recent years, I should like to make the following general remarks regarding the
ON THE NOTIONS OF CAUSALITY AND COMPLEMENTARITY1
Summary A short exposition is given of the foundation of the causal description in classical physics and the failure of the principle of causality in coping with atomic phenomena. It is emphasized
Bayesian just-so stories in psychology and neuroscience.
TLDR
It is argued that many of the important constraints in Bayesian theories in psychology and neuroscience come from biological, evolutionary, and processing considerations that have no adaptive relevance to the problem per se.
...
1
2
3
...