Darwinian Metaphysics: Species And The Question Of Essentialism

  title={Darwinian Metaphysics: Species And The Question Of Essentialism},
  author={Samir Okasha},
  • S. Okasha
  • Published 1 May 2002
  • Philosophy, Computer Science
  • Synthese
Biologists and philosophers of biology typically regard essentialism about speciesas incompatible with modern Darwinian theory. Analytic metaphysicians such asKripke, Putnam and Wiggins, on the other hand, believe that their essentialist thesesare applicable to biological kinds. I explore this tension. I show that standard anti-essentialist considerations only show that species do not have intrinsic essential properties. I argue that while Putnam and Kripke do make assumptions that contradict… Expand
Resurrecting Biological Essentialism*
The article defends the doctrine that Linnaean taxa, including species, have essences that are, at least partly, underlying intrinsic, mostly genetic, properties. The consensus among philosophers ofExpand
Individual essentialism in biology
A few philosophers of biology have recently explicitly rejected Essential Membership, the doctrine that if an individual organism belongs to a taxon, particularly a species, it does so essentially.Expand
Can Evolutionary Biology do Without Aristotelian Essentialism?
It is usually maintained by biologists and philosophers alike that essentialism is incompatible with evolutionary biology, and that abandoning essentialism was a precondition of progress being madeExpand
Essentialism in Biology
The many meanings of the notion of essentialism in psychology and social science as well as science are outlined, and pro- and anti-essentialist views are discussed, and some recent historical revisionism is discussed. Expand
Natural Kinds in Evolution and Systematics: Metaphysical and Epistemological Considerations
The debate as to whether taxa are kinds or individuals is revisited, it is argued that both accounts are metaphysically compatible, but that one or the other approach can be pragmatically preferable depending on the epistemic context. Expand
Species, Humans, and Transformations
Do biological species have essences? The debate over this question in philosophy of biology exhibits fundamental confusion both between and within authors. In What to Salvage from the SpeciesExpand
RecentWork onHumanNature: BeyondTraditional Essences
Recent philosophical work on the concept of human nature disagrees on how to respond to the Darwinian challenge, according to which biological species do not have traditional essences. Three broadExpand
Why the Debate about the Metaphysics of Biological Species Should Not Be Deflated
Some philosophers of biology state that the metaphysical status of biological species is context determined by the use different branches of biology make of their corresponding proper names, soExpand
Scientific realism with historical essences: the case of species
This work focuses on assessing the merits of historical essential natures in a paradigm case of Kinds in the non-fundamental sciences: species, and argues that at least in the case of species historical essences are fit for both tasks. Expand
Essentialism About Kinds: An Undead Issue in the Philosophies of Physics and Biology?
The consensus among philosophers of biology is that traditional forms of essentialism have no place in accounts of biological kinds and classification. Recently, however, several authors haveExpand


Evolution, Population Thinking, and Essentialism
  • E. Sober
  • Philosophy
  • Philosophy of Science
  • 1980
Ernst Mayr has argued that Darwinian theory discredited essentialist modes of thought and replaced them with what he has called "population thinking". In this paper, I characterize essentialism asExpand
Are Species Really Individuals
Griselin's argument is argued that species as chunks of the genealogical nexus are individuals, not classes of similar things, and that their names are proper names to be defined ostensively in a manner analogous to a christening. Expand
Contemporary Systematic Philosophies
During the past decade, taxonomists have been engaged in a controversy over the proper methods and foundations of biological classification. Although methodologically inclined taxonomists had beenExpand
A Radical Solution to the Species Problem
Hull (1974) has lately endorsed the idea that, from the point of view of evolutionary theory, biological species and monophyletic taxa are individuals, and Mayr (1969a), while not going so far, strongly emphasizes the point that species are more than just nominal classes. Expand
An Essay concerning Human Understanding
IT is possible to appreciate the reason for this abridged edition of Locke's great Essay and at the same time to regret its appearance. If it had to be done, no living philosopher is so qualified toExpand
Mind, language, and reality
Introduction 1. Language and philosophy 2. The analytic and synthetic 3. Do true assertions correspond to reality? 4. Some issues in the theory of grammar 5. The 'innateness hypothesis' andExpand
The Biological Species Concept: A Critical Evaluation
It is concluded that the phenetic species as normally described is the desirable species concept to be associated with the taxonomic category "species," and that the localized biological population may be the most useful unit for evolutionary study. Expand
Biological Species as Natural Kinds
The fact that the names of biological species refer independently of identifying descriptions does not support the view of Ghiselin and Hull that species are individuals. Species may be regarded asExpand
A Matter of Individuality
  • D. Hull
  • Philosophy
  • Philosophy of Science
  • 1978
Biological species have been treated traditionally as spatiotemporally unrestricted classes. If they are to perform the function which they do in the evolutionary process, they must beExpand
Getting Rid of Species
The implications of generalizing the species problem as a special case of the taxon problem, and the practical implications of eliminating the rank of species for such areas as ecology, evolution, and conservation are explored. Expand