Darwinian Metaphysics: Species And The Question Of Essentialism

  title={Darwinian Metaphysics: Species And The Question Of Essentialism},
  author={Samir Okasha},
  • S. Okasha
  • Published 1 May 2002
  • Philosophy
  • Synthese
Biologists and philosophers of biology typically regard essentialism about speciesas incompatible with modern Darwinian theory. Analytic metaphysicians such asKripke, Putnam and Wiggins, on the other hand, believe that their essentialist thesesare applicable to biological kinds. I explore this tension. I show that standard anti-essentialist considerations only show that species do not have intrinsic essential properties. I argue that while Putnam and Kripke do make assumptions that contradict… 

Resurrecting Biological Essentialism*

The article defends the doctrine that Linnaean taxa, including species, have essences that are, at least partly, underlying intrinsic, mostly genetic, properties. The consensus among philosophers of

Individual essentialism in biology

A few philosophers of biology have recently explicitly rejected Essential Membership, the doctrine that if an individual organism belongs to a taxon, particularly a species, it does so essentially.

Can Evolutionary Biology do Without Aristotelian Essentialism?

To impartial observers it is likely to appear that both evolutionary biology and essentialism are as well supported in their respective domains as could reasonably be expected, and there is at least a prima facie tension here between evolutionary biology, metaphysics and pre-theoretical common sense.

Essentialism in Biology

The many meanings of the notion of essentialism in psychology and social science as well as science are outlined, and pro- and anti-essentialist views are discussed, and some recent historical revisionism is discussed.

Natural Kinds in Evolution and Systematics: Metaphysical and Epistemological Considerations

The debate as to whether taxa are kinds or individuals is revisited, it is argued that both accounts are metaphysically compatible, but that one or the other approach can be pragmatically preferable depending on the epistemic context.

Species, Humans, and Transformations

Do biological species have essences? The debate over this question in philosophy of biology exhibits fundamental confusion both between and within authors. In What to Salvage from the Species

RecentWork onHumanNature: BeyondTraditional Essences

Recent philosophical work on the concept of human nature disagrees on how to respond to the Darwinian challenge, according to which biological species do not have traditional essences. Three broad

A Conceptualist View in the Metaphysics of Species

The species concept is one of the central concepts in biological science. Although modern systematics speculates about the existence of a complex hierarchy of nested taxa, biological species are

Scientific realism with historical essences: the case of species

This work focuses on assessing the merits of historical essential natures in a paradigm case of Kinds in the non-fundamental sciences: species, and argues that at least in the case of species historical essences are fit for both tasks.

Essentialism About Kinds: An Undead Issue in the Philosophies of Physics and Biology?

The consensus among philosophers of biology is that traditional forms of essentialism have no place in accounts of biological kinds and classification. Recently, however, several authors have



Evolution, Population Thinking, and Essentialism

  • E. Sober
  • Philosophy
    Philosophy of Science
  • 1980
Ernst Mayr has argued that Darwinian theory discredited essentialist modes of thought and replaced them with what he has called "population thinking". In this paper, I characterize essentialism as

Are Species Really Individuals

Griselin's argument is argued that species as chunks of the genealogical nexus are individuals, not classes of similar things, and that their names are proper names to be defined ostensively in a manner analogous to a christening.

Contemporary Systematic Philosophies

This phenetic school of taxonomy had its origins in a series of papers in which several workers attempted to quantify the processes and procedures used by taxonomists to classify organisms, of special interest was the process of weighting.

A Radical Solution to the Species Problem

Hull (1974) has lately endorsed the idea that, from the point of view of evolutionary theory, biological species and monophyletic taxa are individuals, and Mayr (1969a), while not going so far, strongly emphasizes the point that species are more than just nominal classes.

An Essay concerning Human Understanding

IT is possible to appreciate the reason for this abridged edition of Locke's great Essay and at the same time to regret its appearance. If it had to be done, no living philosopher is so qualified to

Mind, language, and reality

Introduction 1. Language and philosophy 2. The analytic and synthetic 3. Do true assertions correspond to reality? 4. Some issues in the theory of grammar 5. The 'innateness hypothesis' and

The Biological Species Concept: A Critical Evaluation

It is concluded that the phenetic species as normally described is the desirable species concept to be associated with the taxonomic category "species," and that the localized biological population may be the most useful unit for evolutionary study.

Philosophy of Biology

General Preface (D. Gabbay, P. Thagard and J. Woods) Contents Preface (Mohan Matthen and Christopher Stephens) List of Contributors I. Biography Darwin (Michael Ruse) Sir Ronald Aylmer Fisher (Robert

Biological Species as Natural Kinds

The fact that the names of biological species refer independently of identifying descriptions does not support the view of Ghiselin and Hull that species are individuals. Species may be regarded as

A Matter of Individuality

  • D. Hull
  • Philosophy
    Philosophy of Science
  • 1978
Biological species have been treated traditionally as spatiotemporally unrestricted classes. If they are to perform the function which they do in the evolutionary process, they must be