Dark Energy Survey Year 1 results: Cosmological constraints from cosmic shear

@article{Troxel2018DarkES,
  title={Dark Energy Survey Year 1 results: Cosmological constraints from cosmic shear},
  author={Michael Troxel and Niall MacCrann and Joe Zuntz and T. F. Eifler and E. Krause and Scott Dodelson and Daniel Gruen and Jonathan A. Blazek and Oliver Friedrich and Simon Samuroff and Judit Prat and Lucas F. Secco and C. L. Davis and Agnes Fert'e and Joseph DeRose and Alex Alarcon and Adam Amara and Eric J. Baxter and Matthew R. Becker and Gary M. Bernstein and Sarah Bridle and R. Cawthon and C. L. Chang and Ami Choi and Juan de Vicente and Alex Drlica-Wagner and J. Elvin-Poole and Joshua A. Frieman and Marco Gatti and William G. Hartley and Klaus Honscheid and Ben Hoyle and Eric M. Huff and Dragan Huterer and B. Jain and Michael Jarvis and Tomasz Kacprzak and Donnacha Kirk and Nickolas Kokron and C. Krawiec and Ofer Lahav and Andrew R. Liddle and John A Peacock and Markus Michael Rau and Alexandre R{\'e}fr{\'e}gier and Richard Rollins and Eduardo Rozo and Eli S. Rykoff and Carles S'anchez and Ignacio Sevilla-Noarbe and Erin S. Sheldon and Albert Stebbins and T. N. Varga and Pauline Vielzeuf and M. Y. Wang and Risa H. Wechsler and Brian Yanny and Timothy M. C. Abbott and Filipe B. Abdalla and Sahar Allam and James T. Annis and Keith C. Bechtol and Aur{\'e}lien Benoit-L{\'e}vy and Emmanuel Bertin and David Brooks and Elizabeth Buckley-Geer and David L. Burke and Aurelio Carnero Rosell and Matias Carrasco Kind and Jorge Carretero and Francisco J. Castander and Mart{\'i}n Crocce and Carlos E. Cunha and Chris D'Andrea and Luiz Nicolaci da Costa and Darren Lee Depoy and Shantanu Desai and H. Thomas Diehl and J. P. Dietrich and Peter Doel and Eduardo B. Fernandez and Brenna L. Flaugher and Pablo Fosalba and Juan Garc'ia-Bellido and Enrique Gazta{\~n}aga and David W. Gerdes and T. Giannantonio and Daniel A. Goldstein and Robert A. Gruendl and Julia Gschwend and Gaston R. Guti{\'e}rrez and David J. James and Tesla E. Jeltema and M. W. G. Johnson and M. D. Johnson and Stephen Kent and Kyler W. Kuehn and Stephen E. Kuhlmann and Nikolay Kuropatkin and T. S. Li and Marcos Lima and H. Lin and Marcio A. G. Maia and M March and Jennifer L. Marshall and Paul Martini and Peter Melchior and Felipe Menanteau and Ramon Miquel and Joseph J. Mohr and Eric H. Neilsen and Robert C. Nichol and Brian Nord and Don Petravick and Andreas Alejandro Plazas and A. K. Romer and Aaron Roodman and Masao Sako and Eusebio S{\'a}nchez and Victor E. Scarpine and Rafe H. Schindler and Michael S. Schubnell and M. Smith and R. C. Smith and Marcelle Soares-Santos and Flavia Sobreira and Eric Suchyta and Mollye E. C. Swanson and Gregory G. Tarl{\'e} and D. Thomas and Douglas L. Tucker and Vinu Vikram and Alistair R. Walker and Jochen Weller and Y. Zhang},
  journal={Physical Review D},
  year={2018}
}
We use 26 million galaxies from the Dark Energy Survey (DES) Year 1 shape catalogs over 1321 deg 2 of the sky to produce the most significant measurement of cosmic shear in a galaxy survey to date. We constrain cosmological parameters in both the flat Λ CDM and w CDM models, while also varying the neutrino mass density. These results are shown to be robust using two independent shape catalogs, two independent \photoz\ calibration methods, and two independent analysis pipelines in a blind… 
Cosmological Constraints from Multiple Probes in the Dark Energy Survey.
TLDR
Combined results from these probes derive constraints on the equation of state, w, of dark energy and its energy density in the Universe, demonstrating the potential power of large multiprobe photometric surveys and paving the way for order of magnitude advances in constraints on properties ofdark energy and cosmology over the next decade.
A unified analysis of four cosmic shear surveys
In the past few years, several independent collaborations have presented cosmological constraints from tomographic cosmic shear analyses. These analyses differ in many aspects: the data sets, the
Dark Energy Survey Year 1 results: Methodology and projections for joint analysis of galaxy clustering, galaxy lensing, and CMB lensing two-point functions
Optical imaging surveys measure both the galaxy density and the gravitational lensing-induced shear fields across the sky. Recently, the Dark Energy Survey (DES) Collaboration used a joint fit to
Dark Energy Survey Year 1 Results: Cross-correlation between Dark Energy Survey Y1 galaxy weak lensing and South Pole Telescope +Planck CMB weak lensing
We cross-correlate galaxy weak lensing measurements from the Dark Energy Survey (DES) year-one (Y1) data with a cosmic microwave background (CMB) weak lensing map derived from South Pole Telescope
Dark Energy Survey Year 1 results: constraints on intrinsic alignments and their colour dependence from galaxy clustering and weak lensing
We perform a joint analysis of intrinsic alignments and cosmology using tomographic weak lensing, galaxy clustering, and galaxy–galaxy lensing measurements from Year 1 (Y1) of the Dark Energy
Dark energy survey year 1 results: Constraining baryonic physics in the Universe
Measurements of large-scale structure are interpreted using theoretical predictions for the matter distribution, including potential impacts of baryonic physics. We constrain the feedback strength of
Dark Energy Survey Year 1 results: weak lensing mass calibration of redMaPPer galaxy clusters
We constrain the mass--richness scaling relation of redMaPPer galaxy clusters identified in the Dark Energy Survey Year 1 data using weak gravitational lensing. We split clusters into 4×3 bins of
KiDS-1000 catalogue: Weak gravitational lensing shear measurements
We present weak lensing shear catalogues from the fourth data release of the Kilo-Degree Survey, KiDS-1000, spanning 1006 square degrees of deep and high-resolution imaging. Our ‘gold-sample’ of
Dark energy survey year 3 results: weak lensing shape catalogue
We present and characterize the galaxy shape catalogue from the first 3 yr of Dark Energy Survey (DES) observations, over an effective area of  4143 deg2 of the southern sky. We describe our data
Dark Energy Survey Year 1 results: weak lensing shape catalogues
We present two galaxy shape catalogues from the Dark Energy Survey Year 1 data set, covering 1500 deg2 with a median redshift of 0.59. The catalogues cover two main fields: Stripe 82, and an area
...
...

References

SHOWING 1-10 OF 251 REFERENCES
Cosmology from cosmic shear with Dark Energy Survey science verification data
We present the first constraints on cosmology from the Dark Energy Survey (DES), using weak lensing measurements from the preliminary Science Verification (SV) data. We use 139 square degrees of SV
Dark Energy Constraints from the CTIO Lensing Survey
We perform a cosmological parameter analysis of the 75 deg2 CTIO lensing survey in conjunction with cosmic microwave background (CMB) and Type Ia supernovae data. For ΛCDM cosmologies, we find that
Cosmological constraints from the 100-deg2 weak-lensing survey
We present a cosmic shear analysis of the 100-deg 2 weak-lensing survey, combining data from the CFHTLS-Wide, RCS, VIRMOS-DESCART and GaBoDS surveys. Spanning ∼100 deg 2 , with a median source
COSMOS: Three-dimensional Weak Lensing and the Growth of Structure
We present a three-dimensional cosmic shear analysis of the Hubble Space Telescope COSMOS survey, the largest ever optical imaging program performed in space. We have measured the shapes of galaxies
COSMIC SHEAR RESULTS FROM THE DEEP LENS SURVEY. II. FULL COSMOLOGICAL PARAMETER CONSTRAINTS FROM TOMOGRAPHY
We present a tomographic cosmic shear study from the Deep Lens Survey (DLS), which, providing a limiting magnitude ( ), is designed as a precursor Large Synoptic Survey Telescope (LSST) survey with
Seeing in the dark – II. Cosmic shear in the Sloan Digital Sky Survey
Statistical weak lensing by large-scale structure – cosmic shear – is a promising cosmological tool, which has motivated the design of several large upcoming surveys. Here, we present a measurement
Cosmic shear measurements with Dark Energy Survey science verification data
We present measurements of weak gravitational lensing cosmic shear two-point statistics using Dark Energy Survey Science Verification data. We demonstrate that our results are robust to the choice of
Redshift distributions of galaxies in the Dark Energy Survey Science Verification shear catalogue and implications for weak lensing
We present photometric redshift estimates for galaxies used in the weak lensing analysis of the Dark Energy Survey Science Verification (DES SV) data. Four model-or machine learning-based photometric
Dealing with systematics in cosmic shear studies: New results from the VIRMOS-Descart survey
We present a reanalysis of the VIRMOS-Descart weak lensing data, with a particular focus on different corrections for the variation of the point spread function anisotropy (PSF) across the CCDs. We
Dark energy constraints from cosmic shear power spectra: impact of intrinsic alignments on photometric redshift requirements
Cosmic shear constrains cosmology by exploiting the apparent alignments of pairs of galaxies due to gravitational lensing by intervening mass clumps. However, galaxies may become (intrinsically)
...
...