Dangerous Dyads

@article{Bremer1992DangerousD,
  title={Dangerous Dyads},
  author={Stuart A. Bremer},
  journal={Journal of Conflict Resolution},
  year={1992},
  volume={36},
  pages={309 - 341}
}
  • S. Bremer
  • Published 1992
  • Political Science
  • Journal of Conflict Resolution
Theoretical arguments and some empirical evidence suggest that war is more likely to occur between states that are geographically proximate, approximately equal in power, major powers, allied, undemocratic, economically advanced, and highly militarized than between those that are not. Bivariate analyses of these seven factors in relation to the onset of interstate war over all pairs of states in the period from 1816 to 1965 generally support these associations. However, multivariate analyses… Expand

Tables from this paper

Polities and Peace
In this paper, we review the central claim of a growing literature: that is, that democratic states rarely, if ever, wage war against and are very unlikely to engage in militarized disputes withExpand
Geography, democracy, and peace
Several decades of systematic empirical work on the causes of war have generated a great many findings but few solid regularities. This article argues that there are two strong, known regularities:Expand
The Severity of Interstate Disputes
Two fundamentalar guments are presented to answer whether dyadic balances or preponderances of military capability are more peaceful. First, the impact of the dyadic balance of military capabilitiesExpand
Uncovering the Dangerous Alliances
The empirical literature has found that interstate alliances are, with the exception of the nineteenth century after 1815, usually followed by war rather than by peace. This analysis tries toExpand
Uncovering the Dangerous Alliances, 1495–1980
The empirical literature has found that interstate alliances are, with the exception of the nineteenth century after 1815, usually followed by war rather than by peace. This analysis tries toExpand
Gravitating toward War
Countries have better abilities and stronger incentives to engage in militarized conflicts the larger and more powerful they are. The article applies Zipf's notion of a ``gravity model'' to the riskExpand
Rich Neighbors War, Peace, and Economic Development
Theories of economic development suggest variously that national income increases or decreases the propensity for states to ght, while systematic evidence of the impact of development on warfare isExpand
Through a Glass Darkly: Afrocentrism, War, and World Politics
While the two dominant Eurocentric paradigms of world politics, realism and idealism, place greater emphasis on power and regime type, respectively, in their analyses of war, a recently promulgatedExpand
Culture or Contiguity
This study examines the relationships among cultural factors, contiguity, and the onset of interstate war. These concerns are nested within a larger debate about “ethnic conflict” that assumes theExpand
Primed to Fight
Ample empirical evidence suggests that there exist structural differences between groups of states in terms of conflict involvement rates. A small group of states accounts for most conflicts and warsExpand
...
1
2
3
4
5
...

References

SHOWING 1-10 OF 63 REFERENCES
Dyadic International War 1816-1965: the Role of Power Parity and Geographical Proximity
rT HIS article describes a data-based study of the relationship between international war (the dependent variable) and two independent variables: (1) the national power equivalence, or power parity,Expand
Domestic Structure, Decisional Constraints, and War
It has often been argued that democracies are less war-prone than other forms of government because the people, who must bear the costs of war in lives and resources, will restrain the aggressiveExpand
Overwhelming Preponderance as a Pacifying Condition Among Contiguous Asian Dyads, 1950–1969
It has been proposed that preponderance of power is favorable to the prevention of war, whereas relative equality of power is conducive to war. Here, the “preponderance promotes peace” proposition isExpand
Libertarianism and International Violence
Based on theory and previous results, three hypotheses are posed: (1) Libertarian states have no violence between themselves. (2) The more libertarian two states, the less their mutual violence. (3)Expand
ARMS RACES TO WAR: TESTING SOME EMPIRICAL LINKAGES*
This article investigates the impact that arms races have on the probability of major power rivals going to war. Twenty-two enduring rivalries in the years 1816-1980 are the focus of investigation.Expand
Regime Types and International Conflict, 1816-1976
This study replicates and extends previous inquiries on the relations between regime type and conflict involvement of states. It examines the robustness of previous findings with respect to variousExpand
Mirror, Mirror on the Wall...
This analysis compares the incidence of war involvement by countries with comparatively more and less political freedom. It examines the proposition that political freedom promotes peace, asExpand
Democracy and War Involvement
Most quantitative researchers had agreed that regime type and war involvement are not significantly related to each other until Rummel recently challenged this consensus. According to Rummel,Expand
Arms Races and Escalation: A Closer Look
The relationship between arms races and war is a critical consideration in both peace research and strategic planning. This study reconsiders the work of Michael Wallace which has postulated thatExpand
Formal Alliances, 1816-1965: an Extension of the Basic Data
In an earlier number of this Journal, we published our findings on the distribution of formal alliances among the members of the interstate system during the period between the Napoleonic Wars andExpand
...
1
2
3
4
5
...