Danger Ahead: Risk Assessment and the Future of Bail Reform

@article{Koepke2018DangerAR,
  title={Danger Ahead: Risk Assessment and the Future of Bail Reform},
  author={John Logan Koepke and David G. Robinson},
  journal={LSN: Procedure (Other Procedural Issues},
  year={2018}
}
In the last five years, legislators in all fifty states have made changes to their pretrial justice systems. Reform efforts aim to shrink jails by incarcerating fewer people— particularly poor, low-risk defendants and racial minorities. Many jurisdictions are embracing pretrial risk assessment instruments—statistical tools that use historical data to forecast which defendants can safely be released—as a centerpiece of reform. Now, many are questioning the extent to which pretrial risk… Expand
The false promise of risk assessments: epistemic reform and the limits of fairness
  • Ben Green
  • Psychology, Computer Science
  • FAT*
  • 2020
TLDR
It is concluded that risk assessments are an ill-advised tool for challenging the centrality and legitimacy of incarceration within the criminal justice system and how algorithmic fairness narrows the scope of judgments about justice and how "fair" algorithms can reinforce discrimination. Expand
Evaluating the evidence in algorithmic evidence-based decision-making: the case of US pretrial risk assessment tools
TLDR
The authors highlight the empirical variation in the construction, evaluation and documentation of these tools to carve out the considerable discretion involved along these dimensions and show why evaluating the quality of the evidence delivered by algorithmic risk assessments is a far from straightforward affair. Expand
“Fair” Risk Assessments: A Precarious Approach for Criminal Justice Reform
As risk assessments become increasingly recommended and adopted as a tool for criminal justice reform, the technical community and advocates alike must ask the right questions. Thus far, mostExpand
When Politicization Stops Algorithms in Criminal Justice
The present paper sheds light on the conditions for successfully implementing pretrial risk assessment tools by looking at barriers to their implementation and, specifically, political factors thatExpand
Predicting risk in criminal procedure: actuarial tools, algorithms, AI and judicial decision-making
  • C. McKay
  • Computer Science
  • Current Issues in Criminal Justice
  • 2019
TLDR
The inscrutable proprietary nature of such risk tools and how that may render the calculation of the risk score opaque and unknowable to both the offender and the court are scrutinised. Expand
Algorithmic risk assessments can alter human decision-making processes in high-stakes government contexts
TLDR
Through an online experiment with 2,140 lay participants simulating two high-stakes government contexts, the first large-scale evidence that risk assessments can systematically alter decision-making processes by increasing the salience of risk as a factor in decisions is provided. Expand
Five-County Validation of the Indiana Risk Assessment System – Pretrial Assessment Tool (IRAS-PAT) using a Local Validation Approach
Abstract Local jurisdictions are increasingly using pretrial risk assessment instruments to assess risk of pretrial misconduct and inform release decisions. We adopted a local validation approach toExpand
Bias Testing of the Public Safety Assessment: Error Rate Balance Between Whites and Blacks for New Arrests
TLDR
This study uses data from Kentucky from July 2013 through December 2014 to evaluate differences in predictive bias by race when using a pretrial risk assessment. Expand
Effects of pretrial risk assessments on release decisions and misconduct outcomes relative to practice as usual
TLDR
Pretrial risk assessments can facilitate non-financial release, though with a potentially higher rate of pretrial re-arrest, and structured guidelines may help maximize pretrial release while minimizing misconduct. Expand
From Bright Plots to Blind Spots: Mapping Departures in Case Review Post-Bail Reform in Two New Jersey Courts
This study documents the extent to which prosecutors and judges in New Jersey deviate from new case review protocols post-bail reform. We draw on a random sample of hearings observed in two courts (NExpand
...
1
2
3
4
...

References

SHOWING 1-10 OF 20 REFERENCES
Immigration Detention in the Risk Classification Assessment Era
This article provides the first empirical analysis of Immigration and Customs Enforcement’s (“ICE’s”) new computerized “risk assessment tool” for making custody decisions. The article analyzes riskExpand
J]udges disregard release recommendations, setting bail for as much as 75 percent of all defendants determined to be 'low risk
  • NOT IN IT FOR JUSTICE": HOW CALIFORNIA'S PRETRIAL DETENTION AND BAIL SYSTEM UNFAIRLY PUNISHES POOR PEOPLE 93
  • 2017
Predicting Violence, 90 TEX
  • L. REV
  • 2012
United States v. Salerno: Pretrial Detention Seen Through the Looking Glass, 66 N.C. L. REV
  • 1988
Preventive Detention and Dangerousness Through the Looking Glass, 34 BUFF
  • L. REV
  • 1985
at 445 (quoting Patterson v
  • 1977
Laurence Tribe and other scholars replied in part that a scheme authorizing pretrial detention based on future danger "has all the vices inherent in a law that makes the crime fit the criminal
  • L. REV
  • 1970
An ABA committee considering the issue expressed "serious misgivings" on the proposals, noting that the "purpose of bail is to insure the defendant's presence at the time of trial
  • 1969
...
1
2
...