• DOI:10.1519/18205.1
• Corpus ID: 16389590

DYNAMIC VS.STATIC‐STRETCHING WARM UP: THE EFFECT ON POWER AND AGILITY PERFORMANCE

@article{McMILLIan2006DYNAMICVW,
  title={DYNAMIC VS.STATIC‐STRETCHING WARM UP: THE EFFECT ON POWER AND AGILITY PERFORMANCE},
  author={dannY J. McMILLIan and Josef H. Moore and Brian S Hatler and Dean C. Taylor},
  journal={Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research},
  year={2006},
  volume={20},
  pages={492–499}
}

• D. McMILLIan, Josef H. Moore, +1 author D. Taylor
• Published 1 August 2006
• Education
• Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research

The purpose of this study was to compare the effect of a dynamic warm up (DWU) with a static-stretching warm up (SWU) on selected measures of power and agility. Thirty cadets at the United States Military Academy completed the study (14 women and 16 men, ages 18–24 years). On 3 consecutive days, subjects performed 1 of the 2 warm up routines (DWU or SWU) or performed no warm up (NWU). The 3 warm up protocols lasted 10 minutes each and were counterbalanced to avoid carryover effects. After 1–2 minutes of recovery, subjects performed 3 tests of power or agility. The order of the performance tests (T-shuttle run, underhand medicine ball throw for distance, and 5-step jump) also was counterbalanced. Repeated measures analysis of variance revealed better performance scores after the DWU for all 3 performance tests (p < 0.01), relative to the SWU and NWU. There were no significant differences between the SWU and NWU for the medicine ball throw and the T-shuttle run, but the SWU was associated with better scores on the 5-step jump (p < 0.01). Because the results of this study indicate a relative performance enhancement with the DWU, the utility of warm up routines that use static stretching as a stand-alone activity should be reassessed.