DO CONSTITUTIONAL CONVENTIONS BIND

@article{Jaconelli2005DOCC,
  title={DO CONSTITUTIONAL CONVENTIONS BIND},
  author={Joseph Jaconelli},
  journal={Cambridge Law Journal},
  year={2005},
  volume={64},
  pages={149-176}
}
  • J. Jaconelli
  • Published 24 March 2005
  • History
  • Cambridge Law Journal
C ONSTITUTIONAL conventions are to be found in political and legal systems of very different types. Not surprisingly, they exist in considerable abundance in those systems—the prime example is the United Kingdom—the affairs of which are ordered by an unwritten constitution. Familiar instances of constitutional conventions in British government include the following: that the Monarch is required to appoint as Prime Minister the person best placed to command a majority in the House of Commons… 
Towards a Jurisprudence of Constitutional Conventions
The status of the conventions of the constitution is controversial. According to traditional understanding they are binding constitutional, but not legal, rules because they are not judicially
The Unwritten Constitution of the United Kingdom
  • J. Baker
  • Law
    Ecclesiastical Law Journal
  • 2012
There has been much talk of constitutional reform in recent years, but the changes that have actually been taking place have often differed markedly from those that the Government has professed to
On the Distinction Between Law and Convention
Conventions are fundamental to the constitutional systems of parliamentary democracies. Unlike the United States, which adopted a republican form of government – with a full separation of powers –
Conventions of Unamendability: Covert Constitutional Unamendability in (Two) Politically Enforced Constitutions
Legal scholarship on the unamendability of constitutional provisions regularly tends to focus on legal systems that operate a constitutional court or some other form of (strong) judicial review of
LAW, DEMOCRACY, AND CONSTITUTIONALISM: REFLECTIONS ON EVANS v ATTORNEY GENERAL
  • T. Allan
  • Law
    The Cambridge Law Journal
  • 2016
Abstract The difference of judicial opinion in the Supreme Court in Evans provokes reflection on fundamental constitutional principles, such as parliamentary sovereignty and the rule of law. A
The Separation of Powers in the Contemporary Constitution: Judicial Competence and Independence in the United Kingdom
Roger Masterman examines the dividing lines between the powers of the judicial branch of government and those of the executive and legislative branches in the light of two of the most significant
The Legal Relevance of Constitutional Conventions in the United Kingdom and the Netherlands
  • M. Vetzo
  • Law, History
    Utrecht Law Review
  • 2018
Constitutional conventions are rules of political practice accepted as binding by those concerned in the working of the constitution. This peculiar category of constitutional rules occupies an
Courting Constitutional Danger: Constitutional Conventions and the Legacy of the Patriation Reference
The legacy of the Supreme Court of Canada’s decisions in the Patriation Reference (1981) and the Quebec Veto Reference (1982) is more political than jurisprudential. In particular, the Supreme
The Crown’s “Democratic” Reserve Powers
This essay argues that the application of democratic theory to the reserve powers, which developed before the emergence of responsible government, has led to ambiguity surrounding the role of head of
The political constitution no more
The British constitution has recently undergone some dramatic changes which, according to leading constitutional scholar Vernon Bogdanor, signals the demise of the 'old' political constitution and
...
...