DETERRENCE AND INTERNATIONAL CONFLICT: Empirical Findings and Theoretical Debates

@article{Huth1999DETERRENCEAI,
  title={DETERRENCE AND INTERNATIONAL CONFLICT: Empirical Findings and Theoretical Debates},
  author={Paul K. Huth},
  journal={Annual Review of Political Science},
  year={1999},
  volume={2},
  pages={25-48}
}
  • Paul K. Huth
  • Published 1 June 1999
  • Economics
  • Annual Review of Political Science
▪ Abstract The utility of military threats as a means to deter international crises and war has been a central topic of international relations research. Rational choice models have provided the foundation for theorizing about the conditions under which conventional deterrence is likely to succeed or fail. Rational deterrence theorists have focused on four sets of variables: the balance of military forces, costly signaling and bargaining behavior, reputations, and interests at stake. Over the… 
Deterrence theory: where do we stand?
Abstract Although deterrence theory was a central focus in the study of International Relations during the Cold War, attention has shifted away from deterrence since the end of that conflict.
Reconciling Rationality with Deterrence
This article argues that classical (or rational) deterrence theory is logically inconsistent, empirically inaccurate and prescriptively deficient. In its stead it offers an alternative theoretical
Political Instability and the Failure of Deterrence
To study the conceptual foundations of deterrence, we develop a model of an international crisis between a country seeking to maintain a peaceful status quo (Defender), and a potential aggressor
Deterrence Now: Deterrence in the post-Cold War world
This chapter offers an overview of how the nature and functions of deterrence in international politics have begun to change, applying themes of preceding chapters to contemporary concerns. To more
Unfair fights: Power asymmetry, nascent nuclear capability, and preventive conflict
Scholars have long recognized that imminent shifts in relative power may motivate declining states to initiate conflict. But what conditions exacerbate the risk posed by these anticipated power
Testing Perfect Deterrence Theory
The stage has now been set: in the first chapter, I argued that our understanding of general deterrence is hampered in part because of a divide between formal theories and the empirical analyses of
Unfair Fights : Power Asymmetry , Nascent Nuclear Capability , and Preventive Conflict
Scholars have long recognized that imminent shifts in relative power may motivate declining states to initiate conflict. But what conditions exacerbate the risk posed by these anticipated power
Lessons in deterrence: Evaluating coercive diplomacy in Syria, 2012–2019
  • John Mitton
  • Political Science
    Journal of Strategic Studies
  • 2019
ABSTRACT This paper assesses deterrence efforts against the use of chemical weapons in Syria through the framework of rational deterrence theory (RDT). Deterrence succeeds and fails over stages and
Toward a Unified Theory of Interstate Conflict
This article seeks to refine the power transition proposition, thereby reducing its permissiveness, by linking it to an axiomatically compatible theory of interstate conflict initiation called
Deterrence and Fear: Incorporating Emotions into the Field of Research
For many years deterrence was seen and has been constructed as a rational strategy, relying on the view that policy makers are making cost-benefit calculations when they are considering challenging
...
...

References

SHOWING 1-10 OF 43 REFERENCES
The Escalation of Great Power Militarized Disputes: Testing Rational Deterrence Theory and Structural Realism
Realism has been the dominant paradigm in the study of international conflict. Within this paradigm, two leading alternative approaches have been deterrence theory and structural realism. We test the
Deterrence Theory Revisited
Because of its parsimony and power, deterrence theory is the most important American theory of international relations. Yet it has many faults. The boundaries outside of which it does not apply are
Signaling Versus the Balance of Power and Interests
Conventional wisdom holds that in international disputes, a state's military threast are more likely to work the more the state is favored by the balance of power or the balance of interests.
Rational Deterrence Theory and Comparative Case Studies
TLDR
Rational deterrence is a more successful theory than portrayed in this literature, and it remains the only intellectually powerful alternative available.
Deterrence and Bargaining
Recent disputes about whether nuclear superiority still has any meaning raise the question of what relation exists between threats of nuclear punishment and bargaining power. This article argues that
DETERRENCE: The Elusive Dependent Variable
THE testing of theory in international relations requires clearly articulated assumptions, the specification of scope conditions, rigorously formulated propositions, appropriate tests, and a valid
The Calculus of Deterrence
A persistent problem for American political and military planners has been the question of how to defend “third areas.” How can a major power make credible an intent to defend a smaller ally from
Prospect Theory, Rational Choice, and International Relations
A half-decade after the first systematic applications of prospect theory to international relations, scholars continue to debate its potential utility as a theoretical framework. Key questions
Deterrence Failures: A Second Look
I w h e n does deterrence fail to deter? Proponents of traditional deterrence theory would answer: since leaders considering a challenge to another country’s commitment are capable of reckoning the
General Deterrence between Enduring Rivals: Testing Three Competing Models.
General deterrence, unlike immediate deterrence, has rarely been analyzed in a systematic comparative manner. We outline a research design for doing so, by studying the circumstances under which, in
...
...