D 2 . 2 . 2 : Specification of a benchmarking methodology for alignment techniques

@inproceedings{Ehrig2005D2,
  title={D 2 . 2 . 2 : Specification of a benchmarking methodology for alignment techniques},
  author={Marc Ehrig and Ra{\'u}l Garc{\'i}a Castro},
  year={2005}
}
This document considers potential strategies for evaluating ontology alignment algorithms. It identifies various goals for such an evaluation. In the context of the Knowledge web network of excellence, the most important objective is the improvement of existing methods. We examine general evaluation strategies as well as efforts that have already been undergone in the specific field of ontology alignment. We then put forward some methodological and practical guidelines for running such an… CONTINUE READING
2 Citations
8 References
Similar Papers

Citations

Publications citing this paper.

References

Publications referenced by this paper.
Showing 1-8 of 8 references

Lessons learned from aligning two representations of anatomy

  • Zhanget al, 2004 Songmao Zhang, Peter Mork, Olivier Bodenreider
  • 2004

Specification of a common framework for characterizing alignment

  • Paolo Bouquet, Jérôme Euzenat, Enrico Franconi, Luciano Serafini, Giorgos Stamou, Sergio Tessaris
  • deliverable D2.2.1, Knowledge web NoE,
  • 2004

editors

  • Ryutaro Ichise, Hideaki Takeda, Shinichi Honiden. Integrating multiple internet directories Gottlob, Toby Walsh
  • IJCAI, pages 22–30. Morgan Kaufmann,
  • 2003
1 Excerpt

Similar Papers

Loading similar papers…