Current Physics and ‘the Physical’

@article{Vicente2011CurrentPA,
  title={Current Physics and ‘the Physical’},
  author={Agust{\'i}n Vicente},
  journal={The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science},
  year={2011},
  volume={62},
  pages={393 - 416}
}
  • Agustín Vicente
  • Published 1 June 2011
  • Philosophy, Physics, Education
  • The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science
Physicalism is the claim that that there is nothing in the world but the physical. Philosophers who defend physicalism have to confront a well-known dilemma, known as Hempel’s dilemma, concerning the definition of ‘the physical’: if ‘the physical’ is whatever current physics says there is, then physicalism is most probably false; but if ‘the physical’ is whatever the true theory of physics would say that there is, we have that physicalism is vacuous and runs the risk of becoming trivial. This… 
There IS a Question of Physicalism
The most common catchphrase of physicalism is: “everything is physical”. According to Hempel’s Dilemma, however, physicalism is an ill-formed thesis because it can offer no account of the physics to
Physicalism, Closure, and the Structure of Causal Arguments for Physicalism: A Naturalistic Formulation of the Physical
Physicalism is the idea that everything either is physical or is nothing over and above the physical. For this formulation of physicalism to have determinate content, it should be identified what the
The Causal Closure of What? An Epistemological Critique of the Principle of Causal Closure
The paper analyses the so-called causal-closure thesis: “Pick any physical event (...) and trace its causal ancestry or posterity as far as you would like; the principle of causal closure of the
A Dilemma about the Mental
Physicalism demands an explication of what it means for something to be physical. But the most popular way of providing one—viz., characterizing the physical in terms of the postulates of a
Where to Look for Emergent Properties
Recent years have seen renewed interest in the emergence issue. The contemporary debate, in contrast with that of past times, has to do not so much with the mind–body problem as with the relationship
Functions and emergence: when functional properties have something to say
In a recent paper, Bird (in: Groff (ed.) Revitalizing causality: Realism about causality in philosophy and social science, 2007) has argued that some higher-order properties—which he calls “evolved
Functionalism and structuralism as philosophical stances: van Fraassen meets the philosophy of biology
I consider the broad perspectives in biology known as ‘functionalism’ and ‘structuralism’, as well as a modern version of functionalism, ‘adaptationism’. I do not take a position on which of these
Causation and Mental Causation: Standpoints and Intersections
The distinguishing features of human powers and agency have long been widely acknowledged and analysed. At the same time, the modern and contemporary philosophical problem of mental causation, in its
Methodological naturalism in the sciences
Creationists have long argued that evolutionary science is committed to a dogmatic metaphysics of naturalism and materialism, which is based on faith or ideology rather than evidence. The standard
Why pan-dispositionalism is incompatible with metaphysical naturalism
Pan-dispositionalism is one of the major theories in current analytic metaphysics concerning dispositional properties (i.e., causal powers / capacities / abilities) and how they relate to categorical
...
1
2
...

References

SHOWING 1-10 OF 48 REFERENCES
A defence of the Via Negativa argument for physicalism
Given this premiss, and assuming the implausibility of systematic causal overdetermination, it follows that everything that has a physical effect must itself be physical. However, what does
A note on the completeness of ‘physics’
1. One argument for physicalism states that all physical effects are due to physical causes, and hence that anything having physical effects must itself be physical. Let us call this now familiar
Why Physics Alone Cannot Define the ‘Physical’: Materialism, Metaphysics, and the Formulation of Physicalism
Materialist metaphysicians want to side with physics, but not to take sides within physics. If we took literally the claim of a materialist that his position is simply belief in the claim that all is
A Mereological Characterization of Physicalism
Physicalism is usually understood as the claim that every empirical entity is or is determined by physical entities. The claim is however imprecise until it is clarified what are the physical
The Physical: Empirical, not Metaphysical
Intuitively, physicalism is the thesis that there’s nothing ‘over and above’ the physical. Going beyond this intuitive formulation requires an account of what it is for a property, kind, relation, or
Physicalism as an attitude
It is widely noted that physicalism, taken as the doctrine that the world contains just what physics says it contains, faces a dilemma which, some like Tim Crane and D.H. Mellor have argued, shows
Physicalism, Supervenience and the Fundamental Level
We provide a formulation of physicalism, and show that this is to be favoured over alternative formulations. Much of the literature on physicalism assumes without argument that there is a fundamental
The Overdetermination Argument Revisited
TLDR
This paper analyzes one response to the overdetermination argument, which consists in saying that what mental events cause are not physical effects, and shows that there seems to be a philosophical “niche” in which this way might fit.
On the Causal Completeness of Physics
According to an increasing number of authors, the best, if not the only, argument in favour of physicalism is the so‐called ‘overdetermination argument’. This argument, if sound, establishes that all
What Does the Conservation of Energy Have to Do with Physicalism
The conservation of energy law, a law of physics that states that the total energy of any closed system is always conserved, is a bedrock principle that has achieved both broad theoretical and
...
1
2
3
4
5
...