Corpus ID: 55105523

Crowdfunded Justice: On the Potencial Benefits and Challenges of Crowdfunding as a Litigation Financing Tool

@article{Gmez2015CrowdfundedJO,
  title={Crowdfunded Justice: On the Potencial Benefits and Challenges of Crowdfunding as a Litigation Financing Tool},
  author={M. A. G{\'o}mez},
  journal={University of San Francisco law review},
  year={2015},
  volume={49},
  pages={307}
}
  • M. A. Gómez
  • Published 2015
  • Business
  • University of San Francisco law review
    • This Article describes the blossoming CLF sector by placing it in the context of the fast-growing crowdfunding industry and the alternative litigation finance industry. Part I first explains the basic structure, variations in the types of crowdfunding financing, and the overall impact of crowdfunding, after which this Article turns to highlight the most important issues that arise in the context of alternative litigation finance in Part II. Subsequently, in Part III, the Article explains the… CONTINUE READING
    cpb-us-w2.wpmucdn.com

    Tables from this paper

    Tables

    References

    SHOWING 1-10 OF 16 REFERENCES
    Screening Out Innovation: The Merits of Meritless Litigation
    • 5
    • PDF
    Full Disclosure? Conflicts of Interest Arising from Third-Party Funding in International Commercial Arbitration
    • JENNIFER A. TRUSZ
    • 2013
    • 2
    See supra Part I.B. 182. Crowdfunding, CUTTING EDGE CAPITAL
    • 2015
    Thomas , Frivolous Cases , 59 DEPAUL L
    • . REV .
    • 2014
    Frivolous Cases, 59 DEPAUL L
    • REv
    • 2010
    Reinert, supra note 172, at 1202. 175. Id. at 1203. 176. Id. at 1194. 177. Suja A. Thomas, Frivolous Cases, 59 DEPAUL L. REV
    • 2010
    Crowdfunding for Justice, supra note 141. 169. Id. 170. Id. 171. See supra Part III
      Kickstarter Fraud: Washington Files First Consumer Protection Lawsuit Involving Crowdfunding
      • GEEKWIRE
      Practice Note CM 17
        See Cases, LEXSHARES, supra note 164