Crossref: The sustainable source of community-owned scholarly metadata

@article{Hendricks2020CrossrefTS,
  title={Crossref: The sustainable source of community-owned scholarly metadata},
  author={Ginny Hendricks and Dominika Tkaczyk and Jennifer Lin and P. Feeney},
  journal={Quantitative Science Studies},
  year={2020},
  volume={1},
  pages={414-427}
}
This paper describes the scholarly metadata collected and made available by Crossref, as well as its importance in the scholarly research ecosystem. Containing over 106 million records and expanding at an average rate of 11% a year, Crossref’s metadata has become one of the major sources of scholarly data for publishers, authors, librarians, funders, and researchers. The metadata set consists of 13 content types, including not only traditional types, such as journals and conference papers, but… Expand
24 Citations
Open Science Graphs Must Interoperate!
Visualising Scientific Topic Evolution
A Measure of Research Taste
Citation Intent Classification Using Word Embedding
...
1
2
3
...

References

SHOWING 1-10 OF 20 REFERENCES
Comparing published scientific journal articles to their pre-print versions
Disciplinary differences of the impact of altmetric
  • J. Ortega
  • Medicine, Biology
  • FEMS microbiology letters
  • 2018
The practice of self-citations: a longitudinal study
Network analysis to evaluate the impact of research funding on research community consolidation
The Two-Way Street of Open Access Journal Publishing: Flip It and Reverse It
Do Authors Deposit on Time? Tracking Open Access Policy Compliance
...
1
2
...