Cross-linguistic Representations of Numerals and Number Marking ∗

@inproceedings{Bale2010CrosslinguisticRO,
  title={Cross-linguistic Representations of Numerals and Number Marking ∗},
  author={Alan C. Bale},
  year={2010}
}
Inspired by Partee (2010), this paper defends a broad thesis that all modifiers, including numeral modifiers, are restrictive in the sense that they can only restrict the denotation of the NP or VP they modify. However, the paper concentrates more narrowly on numeral modification, demonstrating that the evidence that motivated Ionin & Matushansky (2006) to assign non-restrictive, privative interpretations to numerals – assigning them functions that map singular sets to sets containing groups… CONTINUE READING

References

Publications referenced by this paper.
Showing 1-10 of 30 references

On the relationship between morphological and semantic markedness: the case of plural morphology

  • Bale, Alan, Michaël Gagnon, Hrayr Khanjian
  • 2010
Highly Influential
3 Excerpts

Formal semantics, lexical semantics, and compositionality: the puzzle of privative adjectives

  • Partee, Barbara.
  • Philologia 7. 7–19.
  • 2010

The interpretation of functional heads: Using comparatives to explore the mass/count distinction

  • Bale, Alan, David Barner
  • Journal of Semantics
  • 2009

Yet more evidence for the emptiness of plurality

  • Bale, Alan.
  • Proceedings of the northeast linguistics society…
  • 2009

Count and mass nouns in Dëne Su̧łiné

  • Wilhelm, Andrea.
  • Donald Baumer, David Montero & Michael Scanlon…
  • 2006

The composition of complex cardinals

  • Ionin, Tania, Ora Matushansky
  • Journal of Semantics
  • 2006