Cross-lingual Models of Word Embeddings: An Empirical Comparison

@article{Upadhyay2016CrosslingualMO,
  title={Cross-lingual Models of Word Embeddings: An Empirical Comparison},
  author={Shyam Upadhyay and Manaal Faruqui and Chris Dyer and Dan Roth},
  journal={ArXiv},
  year={2016},
  volume={abs/1604.00425}
}
Despite interest in using cross-lingual knowledge to learn word embeddings for various tasks, a systematic comparison of the possible approaches is lacking in the literature. We perform an extensive evaluation of four popular approaches of inducing cross-lingual embeddings, each requiring a different form of supervision, on four typographically different language pairs. Our evaluation setup spans four different tasks, including intrinsic evaluation on mono-lingual and cross-lingual similarity… CONTINUE READING

Citations

Publications citing this paper.
SHOWING 1-10 OF 107 CITATIONS

Unsupervised Joint Training of Bilingual Word Embeddings

VIEW 4 EXCERPTS
CITES METHODS & BACKGROUND
HIGHLY INFLUENCED

Word Embeddings for Code-Mixed Language Processing

VIEW 7 EXCERPTS
CITES BACKGROUND, METHODS & RESULTS
HIGHLY INFLUENCED

Cross-Lingual Syntactically Informed Distributed Word Representations

  • EACL
  • 2017
VIEW 9 EXCERPTS
CITES METHODS & BACKGROUND
HIGHLY INFLUENCED

Cross-lingual Lexical Sememe Prediction

  • EMNLP
  • 2018
VIEW 7 EXCERPTS
CITES BACKGROUND
HIGHLY INFLUENCED

FILTER CITATIONS BY YEAR

2016
2019

CITATION STATISTICS

  • 14 Highly Influenced Citations

  • Averaged 33 Citations per year from 2017 through 2019

References

Publications referenced by this paper.
SHOWING 1-10 OF 38 REFERENCES