Crop conundrum.

@article{Dubock2009CropC,
  title={Crop conundrum.},
  author={Adrian C. Dubock},
  journal={Nutrition reviews},
  year={2009},
  volume={67 1},
  pages={17-20}
}
The lead review “Risk assessment of genetically modified crops for nutrition and health” by Magaña-Gómez and Calderon de la Barca,1 ends with a common plea: “more research is needed”. It is valid to put both this plea and the justification for other similar research into perspective. How selective are the reviews that lead to the conclusion that more of such research is needed? What comparators are available? Why genetically modified (GM) crops particularly? And what political effect does the… CONTINUE READING

References

Publications referenced by this paper.
Showing 1-9 of 9 references

Risk assessment of genetically modified crops for nutrition and health

  • JA Magaña-Gómez, AM CalderóndelaBarca
  • Nutrition Reviews. 2008;66:present issue
  • 2008

Starved for Science, How Biotechnology is Being Kept out of Africa

  • R. Paarlberg
  • 2008

The real GM food scandal

  • Dick Taverne
  • Prospect Magazine, November,
  • 2007

The March of Unreason

  • Dick Taverne
  • 2005

Similar Papers

Loading similar papers…