Critique of ‘Australopithecus afarensis’ as a single species based on dental metrics and morphology

@article{Ferguson2006CritiqueO,
  title={Critique of ‘Australopithecus afarensis’ as a single species based on dental metrics and morphology},
  author={Walter W. Ferguson},
  journal={Primates},
  year={2006},
  volume={30},
  pages={561-569}
}
Leonard andHegmon (1987) compare a series of dental metrics of ‘Australopithecus afarensisJohanson, White, andCoppens, 1978’ with criteria for modern apes, to test the hypothesis that ‘A. afarensis’ represents a single species. They also compare the morphology of the lower third premolar. The dental breadth of ‘A. afarensis’ shows a wide range of variation, particularly in the lower third premolar morphology which displays greater variation than in modern apes—yet the study concludes that the… Expand

Figures and Tables from this paper

“Australopithecus afarensis”: A composite species
TLDR
Leonard (1991) reiterates most of his original arguments for supporting “Australopithecus afarensis” as a single species, but disregards the principle of morphological equivalence by comparing the dental metrics and morphology of a hominid with those of species of the Pongidae, which do not correspond with the degree of variation in hominids. Expand
Australopithecus afarensis and the single species hypothesis
TLDR
The balance of the evidence at present indicates that the fossils from Laetoli and Hadar represent a single hominid species, A. afarensis. Expand
A morphometric analysis of hominin teeth attributed to Australopithecus, Paranthropus and Homo
TLDR
The implication of this study is that, especially in the case of modern humans, great caution needs to be exercised in using extant species as analogues for assessing variability considered to be a result of sexual dimorphism in fossil hominin species. Expand
A mathematical landmark-based method for measuring worn molars in hominoid systematics
TLDR
The results support the use of mathematical landmarks to enable the inclusion of worn molar teeth in dental studies so as to maximize sample sizes and restore balance between populations and/or sexes in hominoid systematic studies. Expand

References

SHOWING 1-10 OF 33 REFERENCES
Evolution of P3 morphology in Australopithecus afarensis.
TLDR
The degree and patterning of variation of the 20 known A. afarensis P3s are examined, and a model of sexual differences in niche exploitation, with the females exploiting a more arboreal environment, would seem to be supported by both the dental and postcranial evidence. Expand
An alternative interpretation ofAustralopithecus afarensis fossil material
Hominoid fossils from Hadar, in Ethiopia and Laetoli, in Tanzania, and dated from the late Pliocene, were described as a new species of hominid, “Australopithecus afarensis,”Johanson, WhiteExpand
The taxonomic status ofpraeanthropus africanus (primates: Pongidae) from the late pliocene of Eastern Africa
TLDR
The taxonPraeanthropus africanus (Weinert, 1950), represented by the Garusi maxilla, is valid and reinstated, and the morphological pattern is not that of a primitive hominid, but of a relatively generalized pongid. Expand
A Comparison Between the Olduvai Hominines and Those of Java and Some Implications for Hominid Phylogeny
these lines. The Lake Chad craniofacial fragment, provisionally described by M. Yves Coppens in 1962, as an australopithecine, is not, we are convinced, a member of this sub-family. We understandExpand
An analysis of tooth and body size relationship in five primate taxa.
  • B. Wood
  • Biology, Medicine
  • Folia primatologica; international journal of primatology
  • 1979
TLDR
Computed 'intra' and 'inter' specific allometry coefficients from these data suggest that canine size will usually scale at a higher level than molar crown area, which is at most isometric, and not positively allometric with respect to body size. Expand
Taxonomic status of the hominine cranium KNM-ER 1813 (primates: Homininae) from the Plio/Pleistocene of Koobi Fora
TLDR
The hominine cranium KNM-ER 1813, from the late Plio/Pleistocene of Koobi Fora, has been regarded recently by some authors as a female ofHomo habilis but reassessment of its cranial morphology, dental metrics, proportions, and a new detailed determination of its sex indicates that it is probably a male. Expand
From Multivariate Statistics to Natural Selection: A Reanalysis of the Plio/Pleistocene Hominid Dental Material
Multivariate statistical techniques have had a natural application to the problem of taxa definition in hominid studies. The fundamental problem in taxonomic reconstruction of, first, sortingExpand
Revision of fossil hominid jaws from the plio/pleistocene of hadar, in ethiopia including a new species of the genusHomo (hominoidea: homininae)
TLDR
The assignment of fossil hominoid jaws from the Plio/Pleistocene of Hadar to a single genus,AustralopithecusDart, 1925, is a misnomer, and on the basis of their unique hominine dentition, they are reinterpreted as representing a new species, Homo antiquus nsp. Expand
Allometric analysis of dental variation in a human population.
  • A. J. Perzigian
  • Biology, Medicine
  • American journal of physical anthropology
  • 1981
TLDR
Though significantly correlated, tooth size and body size variables are too weakly associated to permit accurate predictions from regression equations, and evolutionary implications of intraspecific dental allometry are discussed. Expand
The significance of primate paleontology for anthropological studies.
  • E. Simons
  • Biology, Medicine
  • American journal of physical anthropology
  • 1967
The correct use of taxonomic names must become widespread if a clear understanding of primate paleontology is to exist among anthropologists. Physical anthropologists are urged to acquire genuineExpand
...
1
2
3
4
...