Critical Issues in Response-To-Intervention, Comprehensive Evaluation, and Specific Learning Disabilities Identification and Intervention: An Expert White Paper Consensus

@article{Hale2010CriticalII,
  title={Critical Issues in Response-To-Intervention, Comprehensive Evaluation, and Specific Learning Disabilities Identification and Intervention: An Expert White Paper Consensus},
  author={James B. Hale and Vincent C. Alfonso and Virginia W. Berninger and Bruce A. Bracken and Catherine Christo and E. Clark and Morris J. Cohen and Andrew S. Davis and Scott L. Decker and Martha B. Denckla and Ron Dumont and Collin Elliott and Steven G. Feifer and Catherine A. Fiorello and Dawn P. Flanagan and Elaine Fletcher‐Janzen and Diana Geary and Michael M. Gerber and Michael E. Gerner and Stanley L. Goldstein and Noel Gregg and Rosa A. Hagin and Lynne E. Jaffe and Alan S. Kaufman and Nadeen L. Kaufman and Timothy Z. Keith and Frank M. Kline and Carol A. Kochhar-Bryant and Jill Leppanen Lerner and Genevieve Marshall and Jennifer T. Mascolo and Nancy Mather and Mich{\`e}le M. M. Mazzocco and George McCloskey and Kevin S. McGrew and Daniel C. Miller and Jean Miller and Mark P. Mostert and Jack A. Naglieri and Samuel O. Ortiz and Leadelle Phelps and Blanche Podhajski and Linda A. Reddy and Cecil R. Reynolds and Cynthia A. Riccio and Fredrick A. Schrank and Edward K. Schultz and Margaret Semrud-Clikeman and Sally Shaywitz and Julia Simon and Lorraine Silver and Leah M. Swanson and Annmarie Urso and Travis Wasserman and John O. Willis and David L. Wodrich and Peter W. Wright and Jed A. Yalof},
  journal={Learning Disability Quarterly},
  year={2010},
  volume={33},
  pages={223 - 236}
}
Developed in concert with the Learning Disabilities Association of America (LDA), this White Paper regarding specific learning disabilities identification and intervention represents the expert consensus of 58 accomplished scholars in education, psychology, medicine, and the law. Survey responses and empirical evidence suggest that five conclusions are warranted: 1) The SLD definition should be maintained and the statutory requirements in SLD identification procedures should be strengthened; 2… Expand

Tables from this paper

Critical Issues in Specific Learning Disability Identification
As a result of the upcoming Federal reauthorization of the Individuals With Disabilities Education Improvement Act (IDEA), practitioners and researchers have begun vigorously debating whatExpand
Evidence-based assessment and intervention for specific learning disability in school psychology.
Historically, the approach to specific learning disability (SLD) identification and recognition not only differs from state to state within Australia but also differs greatly from that in otherExpand
Identifying Best Practice in a Shifting Landscape: Making Sense of RTI in the Context of SLD Identification
The Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (2004) has had substantial influence on special education in general and the field of learning disabilities in particular. Since its reauthorization inExpand
Comprehensive Cognitive Assessments are not Necessary for the Identification and Treatment of Learning Disabilities.
  • J. Fletcher, Jeremy Miciak
  • Psychology, Medicine
  • Archives of clinical neuropsychology : the official journal of the National Academy of Neuropsychologists
  • 2017
TLDR
It is concluded that current evidence does not justify routine cognitive assessment for LD identification and an instructional conceptualization of LD is offered: a hybrid model that directly informs intervention and is based on documenting low academic achievement, inadequate response to intensive interventions, and a consideration of exclusionary factors. Expand
Specific Learning Disability Identification: What Constitutes a Pattern of Strengths and Weaknesses?.
The 2004 Individuals with Disabilities Education Improvement Act (IDEA) and subsequent regulations published in 2006 have significantly changed the identification process for students suspected ofExpand
Adoption Costs Associated With Processing Strengths and Weaknesses Methods for Learning Disabilities Identification
TLDR
This study presents a systematic case study to estimate the costs associated with adopting routine assessment of cognitive processing for students referred for special education evaluation and estimates that implementation within a district would cost between $1,960 and $2,400 per student. Expand
Identification of Specific Learning Disability Profiles: Consideration of Patterns across Cognitive, Academic, Socio-Emotional, and Executive Variables
During recent years, there has been a growing urgency and a heightened demand for increased accountability for all students to demonstrate academic success in school, as required by the No Child LeftExpand
Ethical and Empirical Considerations in the Identification of Learning Disabilities
The authors encourage those in the field of school psychology to consider the use of learning disabilities assessment practices in relation to specific American Psychological Association and NationalExpand
Patterns of cognitive strengths and weaknesses: Identification rates, agreement, and validity for learning disabilities identification.
TLDR
Low agreement and little evidence of validity for LD identification decisions based on PSW methods are found and an alternative may be to use multiple measures of academic achievement to guide intervention. Expand
The Critical Role of Instructional Response for Identifying Dyslexia and Other Learning Disabilities
TLDR
It is argued that current empirical evidence supports a dyslexia classification marked by specific deficits in reading and spelling words combined with inadequate response to evidence-based instruction, and the proposed “hybrid” Dyslexia identification process demonstrates strong evidence for valid decision-making and directly informs intervention. Expand
...
1
2
3
4
5
...

References

SHOWING 1-10 OF 129 REFERENCES
Response to intervention and the identification of specific learning disabilities: Why we need comprehensive evaluations as part of the process
The purpose of this article is to underscore why we need to maintain the presence of comprehensive evaluations in the identification of students with specific learning disabilities (SLDs). ResponseExpand
Implementation of idea : Integrating response to intervention and cognitive assessment methods
The Individuals with Disabilities Education Improvement Act (IDEA) was reauthorized by the U.S. Congress in 2004, yet ongoing regulatory efforts are required to determine its operationalization andExpand
Integration of response to intervention and norm‐referenced tests in learning disability identification: Learning from the Tower of Babel
Significant limitations in research on learning disability (LD) have included failure to incorporate well-validated guiding theories, use of vague or nonspecific operational definitions, and lack ofExpand
Response to Intervention: Prevention and Remediation, Perhaps. Diagnosis, No.
TLDR
Concerns are concerned about what appears to be a selective review of empirical support for RTI and a consequently overly optimistic view of many practical issues surrounding the implementation of RTI models that neglects the potential negative long-term impact on the range of students with and without a learning disability. Expand
Introduction to Response to Intervention: What, Why, and How Valid Is It?.
On December 3, 2004, President Bush signed into law the Individuals with Disabilities Education Improvement Act (IDEA, 2004). The revised law is different from the previous version in at least oneExpand
Response to Intervention: Preventing and Remediating Academic Difficulties.
TLDR
RTI processes potentially integrate general and special education and suggest new directions for research and public policy related to LDs, but the scaling issues in schools are significant and more research is needed on the use of RTI data for identification. Expand
Feasibility and Consequences of Response to Intervention
This paper provides a response to the thoughtful paper presented by Gerber in this issue and at the National Research Center on Learning Disabilities Responsiveness-to-Intervention Symposium inExpand
School Psychologists' Perceptions regarding the Practice of Identifying Reading Disabilities: Cognitive Assessment and Response to Intervention Considerations.
This study surveyed a national sample of school psychologists with respect to the identification of reading disabilities (RD). It covers school psychologists' opinions regarding perceived benefits ofExpand
Varying Intervention Delivery in Response to Intervention: Confronting and Resolving Challenges With Measurement, Instruction, and Intensity
Response to intervention (RTI) involves ongoing evaluation of children's responsiveness to different levels of evidence-based interventions as a basis for eligibility determination. If students failExpand
Alternative Research-Based Methods for IDEA 2004 Identification of Children With Specific Learning Disabilities
he Individuals with Disabilities EducationImprovement Act (IDEA) of 2004 broughtabout widespread discussion of general andspecial education policies and practices across thecountry. TheExpand
...
1
2
3
4
5
...