• DOI:10.1007/S11558-015-9218-8
• Corpus ID: 154841381

Credibility, preferences, and bilateral investment treaties

@article{Cho2016CredibilityPA,
  title={Credibility, preferences, and bilateral investment treaties},
  author={Seok-ju Cho and Yong kyun Kim and Cheol-Sung Lee},
  journal={The Review of International Organizations},
  year={2016},
  volume={11},
  pages={25-58}
}

• Seok-ju Cho, Yong kyun Kim, Cheol-Sung Lee
• Published 1 March 2016
• Economics
• The Review of International Organizations

When is a commitment mechanism employed as a solution to a time-inconsistency problem? This article provides a nuanced answer to this question by studying bilateral investment treaties (BITs). We develop a game theoretic model of BIT signing in which the government of a capital-importing country and an investor from a capital-exporting country strategically interact. The model predicts that, on the one hand, when host states highly value foreign direct investment (FDI), the likelihood of BITs increases as their judicial institutions lack credibility. On the other hand, when their preferences for FDI are only modest, the likelihood of BITs increases as their judicial institutions become more credible. We employ Cox proportional hazard models to test our hypotheses, and the results largely support our theory. Our findings have broad implications for the large literature on credible commitment, which has paid insufficient attention to the interplay between preferences and credibility.