Creation Science Is Not Science

@article{Ruse1982CreationSI,
  title={Creation Science Is Not Science},
  author={Michael Ruse},
  journal={Science, Technology \& Human Values},
  year={1982},
  volume={7},
  pages={72 - 78}
}
  • M. Ruse
  • Published 1 July 1982
  • Education
  • Science, Technology & Human Values
This article is the first piece of a three-piece exchange between Michael Ruse and Larry Laudan. (We will be reading all three pieces.) Ruse, a prominent philosopher of science (particularly biology), served as an expert witness in a trial concerning the constitutionality of an Arkansas law requiring public school biology teachers to present creationism as a viable scientific alternative to evolutionary theory. 

Better Red than Dead—Putting an End to the Social Irrelevance of Postwar Philosophy of Science

This paper asks what is necessary in a theory of science adequate to the task of empowering philosophers of science to participate in public debate about science in a social context. It is argued

Reverend Paley's naturalist revival.

  • Peter McLaughlin
  • Philosophy
    Studies in history and philosophy of biological and biomedical sciences
  • 2008

Putting Sociology First—Reconsidering the Role of the Social in ‘Nature of Science’ Education

Contrasting two examples from 2005, a creationism-trial and a recent textbook, the article shows two different ways of employing social considerations to demarcate science from non-science. Drawing

Foundational issues in evolution education

There is a great need for effective evolution education. This paper reviews some of the evidence that demonstrates that need and analyzes some of the foundational semantic, epistemological, and

Destructive realism: Metaphysics as the foundation of natural science

This thesis has two philosophical positions as its targets. The first is 'scientific realism' of the form defended by Boyd, (the early) Putnam, and most recently Psillos. The second is empiricism in

Professionalization of American Scientists: Public Science in the Creation/ Evolution Trials

The boundary between science and religion has long been a site for cultural and professional conflict. We examine the testimony of scientists at the Scopes "Monkey Trial" in 1925 and at the McLean

DARRELL PATRICK ROWBOTTOM THESIS SUBMITTED FOR THE DEGREE OF MA IN PHILOSOPHY, OF THE UNIVERSITY OF DURHAM

WHICH METHODOLOGIES OF SCIENCE ARE CONSISTENT WITH SCIENTIFIC REALISM? DARRELL P A TRICK ROWBOTTOM MA IN PHILOSOPHY OF THE UNIVERSITY OF DURHAM, 2002 This thesis sets out to examine which methods it

Religion, Science and Naturalism

Preface 1. Religion and science: strategies, definitions, and issues 2. Histories of relationships between science and religion 3. Theology and knowledge of the world 4. Theology and knowledge of

Popper, Laws, and the Exclusion of Biology from Genuine Science

It is suggested that a cluster class epistemic values approach (which subsumes empirical falsifiability) is the best solution to the demarcation problem between genuine science and pseudo- or non-science.

Postprocessualism and the Nature of Science: A Response to Comments by Hutson and Arnold and Wilkens

The comments by Hutson and Arnold and Wilkens challenge our 1999 argument that postprocessual research can be scientific. Both critique our characteristics of science. Arnold and Wilkens contend that
...

References

SHOWING 1-10 OF 10 REFERENCES

The Genetic Basis of Evolutionary Change

Come with us to read a new book that is coming recently. Yeah, this is a new coming book that many people really want to read will you be one of them? Of course, you should be. It will not make you

For details of these statements, see reference 7 in Judge Overton's ruling

    Hutchinson, 1973); and David L

    • Hull, The Philosophy of Biological Science
    • 1974

    Biology/A Search for Order in Complexity (Grand Rapids

    • MI: Zondervan,
    • 1977

    Creation: The Facts of Life (San Diego

    • CA: Creation-Life Publishers,
    • 1979

    The Genesis Flood (Philadelphia, PA: Pres78 byterian and Reformed

    • Publishing Company,
    • 1961

    Cambridge University Press, 1953); Karl R

    • Popper, The Logic of Scientific Discovery (London: Hutchinson, 1959); E. Nagel, The Structure of Science (London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1961); Thomas S. Kuhn, The Structure of Scientific Revolutions (Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 1962); and C. G. Hempel, The Philosophy of Natural Sci
    • 1966

    Darwin’s Finches (Cambridge, England

    • 1947

    Creation: The Facts of Life

    • 1979

    Evolution—The Fossils Say No

    • (San Diego, CA: Creation-Life Publishers,
    • 1973