Creating, destroying, and restoring value in wikipedia

@inproceedings{Priedhorsky2007CreatingDA,
  title={Creating, destroying, and restoring value in wikipedia},
  author={Reid Priedhorsky and Jilin Chen and Shyong K. Lam and Katherine A. Panciera and Loren G. Terveen and John Riedl},
  booktitle={GROUP '07},
  year={2007}
}
Wikipedia's brilliance and curse is that any user can edit any of the encyclopedia entries. We introduce the notion of the impact of an edit, measured by the number of times the edited version is viewed. Using several datasets, including recent logs of all article views, we show that an overwhelming majority of the viewed words were written by frequent editors and that this majority is increasing. Similarly, using the same impact measure, we show that the probability of a typical article view… 

Figures from this paper

Protection : Another Missing Dimension of Wikipedia Research
TLDR
This note describes page protection and illustrates why it plays an important role in shaping user behavior on wikis, and presents a new longitudinal dataset of page protection events for English Wikipedia and results from tests that support both the validity of the dataset and the impact ofpage protection on patterns of editing.
Keep it Simple: A Companion for Simple Wikipedia?
TLDR
It is suggested that the nature of this mode of decentralized knowledge production and the structure of Wiki‐technology might call for the implementation of an editorial companion to the community.
Don't bite the newbies: how reverts affect the quantity and quality of Wikipedia work
TLDR
Overall it is found that reverts are powerfully demotivating, but that their net influence is that more quality work is done in Wikipedia as a result of reverts than is lost by chasing editors away.
Identifying, understanding and detecting recurring, harmful behavior patterns in collaborative Wikipedia editing: doctoral proposal
In this doctoral proposal, we describe an approach to identify recurring, collective behavioral mechanisms in the collaborative interactions of Wikipedia editors that have the potential to undermine
Assessing the Quality of Wikipedia Editors through Crowdsourcing
TLDR
This paper proposes a method for assessing the quality of Wikipedia editors and uses crowdsourcing to manually detect changes of text meaning, which improves the accuracy of detecting vandals by about 5%.
Page protection: another missing dimension of Wikipedia research
TLDR
This note describes page protection and illustrates why it plays an important role in shaping user behavior on wikis, and presents a new longitudinal dataset of page protection events for English Wikipedia and results from tests that support both the validity of the dataset and the impact ofpage protection on patterns of editing.
Wiki Vandalysis---Wikipedia Vandalism Analysis
TLDR
This paper presents an approach to fighting vandalism by extracting various features from the edits for machine learning classification, and successfully achieves an area under the ROC curve (AUC) of 0.91 on a training set of 15000 human annotated edits and 0.887 on a random sample of 17472 edits from 317443.
Wikipedia vandalism detection
TLDR
The research aims to create a fully-working antivandalism system and get it working in the real world and one of the leading approaches is developed.
Automatic Vandalism Detection in Wikipedia : Towards a Machine Learning Approach
TLDR
This study investigates the possibility of using machine learning techniques to build an autonomous system capable to distinguish vandalism from legitimate edits and reveals that elementary features are not sufficient to build such a system.
Consider the Redirect: A Missing Dimension of Wikipedia Research
TLDR
This note describes redirects and illustrates why they play an important role in shaping activity in Wikipedia, and presents a novel longitudinal dataset of redirects for English Wikipedia and the software used to produce it.
...
1
2
3
4
5
...

References

SHOWING 1-10 OF 36 REFERENCES
Measuring Wikipedia
TLDR
A first overview and outlook on Wikipedia research is given because Wikipedia is particularly interesting to cybermetric research because of the richness of phenomena and because its data is fully accessible.
Power of the Few vs . Wisdom of the Crowd : Wikipedia and the Rise of the Bourgeoisie
TLDR
Although Wikipedia was driven by the influence of “elite” users early on, more recently there has been a dramatic shift in workload to the “common” user, and this is shown in del.icio.us, a very different type of social collaborative knowledge system.
Assessing Information Quality of a Community-Based Encyclopedia
TLDR
This work proposes seven IQ metrics which can be evaluated automatically and test the set on a representative sample of Wikipedia content, along with a number of statistical characterizations of Wikipedia articles, their content construction, process metadata and social context.
He says, she says: conflict and coordination in Wikipedia
TLDR
The growth of non-direct work in Wikipedia is examined and the development of tools to characterize conflict and coordination costs in Wikipedia are described, which may inform the design of new collaborative knowledge systems.
A content-driven reputation system for the wikipedia
TLDR
The results show that the notion of reputation has good predictive value: changes performed by low-reputation authors have a significantly larger than average probability of having poor quality, as judged by human observers, and of being later undone, as measured by the algorithms.
Collaborative Authoring on the Web: A Genre Analysis of Online Encyclopedias
  • Will Emigh, S. Herring
  • Computer Science
    Proceedings of the 38th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences
  • 2005
TLDR
A genre analysis of two web-based collaborative authoring environments, Wikipedia and Everything2, shows that the greater the degree of post-production editorial control afforded by the system, the more formal and standardized the language of the collaboratively-authored documents becomes, analogous to that found in traditional print encyclopedias.
Studying cooperation and conflict between authors with history flow visualizations
TLDR
This paper investigates the dynamics of Wikipedia, a prominent, thriving wiki, and focuses on the relevance of authorship, the value of community surveillance in ameliorating antisocial behavior, and how authors with competing perspectives negotiate their differences.
Using intelligent task routing and contribution review to help communities build artifacts of lasting value
TLDR
A field experiment with 197 contributors shows that simple, intelligent task routing algorithms have large effects, and a model predicts that a CALV will reach the same final value whether contributions are reviewed before or after they are made available to the community.
Internet encyclopaedias go head to head
Jimmy Wales' Wikipedia comes close to Britannica in terms of the accuracy of its science entries, a Nature investigation finds.  UPDATE: see details of how the data were collected for this article in
The dynamics of mass interaction
TLDR
Over 2.15 million messages produced by 659,450 people in 500 representative newsgroups collected over 6 months are analyzed to derive predictions from the common ground model of communication to test predictions about how these parameters interact.
...
1
2
3
4
...