Couscous Mussolini: US perceptions of Gamal Abdel Nasser, the 1958 intervention in Lebanon and the origins of the US–Israeli special relationship

@article{McAlexander2011CouscousMU,
  title={Couscous Mussolini: US perceptions of Gamal Abdel Nasser, the 1958 intervention in Lebanon and the origins of the US–Israeli special relationship},
  author={Richard J. McAlexander},
  journal={Cold War History},
  year={2011},
  volume={11},
  pages={363 - 385}
}
This article argues that the US print media influenced US foreign policy by crafting a powerful narrative of Gamal Abdel Nasser that characterised Nasser as an expansionistic dictator by comparing him to Hitler and Mussolini. This narrative gained currency when the US public became anxious over Israel's security after the Czech arms deal of 1955. The narrative influenced US policy by strengthening the cultural relationship between Israel and the US by describing Nasser in similar terms, and… 
The Czech-Egyptian arms deal of 1955 : a turning point in Middle Eastern Cold War history.
THE CZECH-EGYPTIAN ARMS DEAL OF 1955: A TURNING POINT IN MIDDLE EASTERN COLD WAR HISTORY Thomas M.S. Skaggs November 30, 2015 This study focuses on the Czechoslovakian-Egyptian arms deal of 1955 and
Unintended Consequences: How the U.S.’s Fear of Socialism Affected Policy Decisions in the Middle East
....................................................................................................................................2 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

References

SHOWING 1-10 OF 127 REFERENCES
Beyond alliance : Israel in U.S. foreign policy
This nonpolemical discussion of America's policy towards Israel exposes the controversy surrounding whether Israel has strategic value to the USA or is instead a liability. The author draws his
Perceptions of Palestine: Their Influence on U.S. Middle East Policy
For most of the twentieth century, considered opinion in the United States regarding Palestine has favored the inherent right of Jews to exist in the Holy Land. That Palestinians, as a native
Covering Islam: how the media and the experts determine how we
From the Iranian hostage crisis through the Gulf War and the World Trade Centre bombing, the West has been haunted by a spectre called 'Islam'. As portrayed by the news media - and by a chorus of
The Other Arab-Israeli Conflict: Making America's Middle East Policy, from Truman to Reagan
"The Other Arab-Israeli Conflict" illuminates the controversial course of America's Middle East relations from the birth of Israel to the Reagan administration. Skillfully separating actual
Dawn over Suez: The Rise of American Power in the Middle East, 1952-1957
No event in post World War II diplomacy has been more written about than the Suez crisis of 1956-and for good reason: it signaled the fall of British power and influence in the Middle East. But most
Eden, Suez and the Mass Media: Propaganda and Persuasion During the Suez Crisis
  • T. Shaw
  • History, Political Science
  • 1996
For Britain, the Suez crisis of 1956 was - along with the 1938 Munich crisis - the most divisive and controversial episode of the twentieth century. Centred on a narrow man-made canal linking the
Rethinking Nasserism: Revolution and Historical Memory in Modern Egypt
Foreword by Gabriel Ben-Dor Introduction: Nasserism as a Form of Populism, by Elie Podeh and Onn Winckler Part I. Images of Nasserism 1. Gamal 'Abd al-Nasser: Iconology, Ideology, and Demonology, by
The Press and the Suez Crisis: A Myth Re-Examined
  • R. Negrine
  • Political Science
    The Historical Journal
  • 1982
The Suez crisis of 1956 was undoubtedly a watershed in British foreign policy. The decision to use force against Egypt did not produce the anticipated victory. Though Britain had emerged victorious
Containing Arab Nationalism: The Eisenhower Doctrine and the Middle East
Under the Eisenhower Doctrine, the United States pledged to give increased economic and military aid to receptive Middle Eastern countries and to protect - with US armed forces if necessary - the
US policy towards Israel: The role of political culture in defining the ‘special relationship’
disadvantages which have made legal–rational objectives difficult to achieve. It becomes clear how reinvigorated neo-patrimonial networks, bureaucratic self-interests, and differing client elite
...
...