Costly punishment in the ultimatum game evokes moral concern, in particular when framed as payoff reduction

  title={Costly punishment in the ultimatum game evokes moral concern, in particular when framed as payoff reduction},
  author={Kimmo Eriksson and Pontus Strimling and Per A. Andersson and Torun Lindholm},
  journal={Journal of Experimental Social Psychology},

Tables from this paper

When is it appropriate to reprimand a norm violation? The roles of anger, behavioral consequences, violation severity, and social distance

Experiments on economic games typically fail to find positive reputational effects of using peer punishment of selfish behavior in social dilemmas. Theorists had expected positive reputational effe

Social Versus Moral Preferences in the Ultimatum Game: A Theoretical Model and an Experiment

A theoretical model and an experiment are developed designed to pit social preferences against moral preferences in the Ultimatum Game, finding that, although people recognize that offering half and rejecting low offers are the morally right things to do, moral preferences have no causal impact on UG behavior.

Moral Preferences in Bargaining Games

We report on a large, pre-registered, experiment testing the role of moral preferences in the ultimatum and the impunity games, which vary the veto power of responders. We measure moral preferences

Preferences for Efficiency, Rather Than Preferences for Morality, Drive Cooperation in the One-Shot Stag-Hunt Game

Contrary to what has been observed for the PD, it is found that SHG cooperation is primarily driven by preferences for efficiency, rather than preferences for doing the right thing.

The Effect of Impression Formation on Rejection in the Ultimatum Game

Previous studies have attempted to elucidate people’s motives for rejecting unfair offers in the ultimatum game. One approach assumes that people reject unfair offers to punish ill intentions behind

Does observability amplify sensitivity to moral frames? Evaluating a reputation-based account of moral preferences

A growing body of work suggests that people are sensitive to moral framing in economic games involving prosociality, suggesting that people hold moral preferences for doing the “right thing”. What

The power of moral words: Understanding framing effects in extreme Dictator games using sentiment analysis and moral judgments

It is found that changing only one word in the instructions of an extreme Dictator game can alter people's behavior, and that behavioral changes can be explained using moral judgments and feelings associated to these words.

Do the Right Thing: Experimental Evidence that Preferences for Moral Behavior, Rather Than Equity or Efficiency per se, Drive Human Prosociality

Decades of experimental research show that some people forgo personal gains to benefit others in unilateral anonymous interactions. To explain these results, behavioral economists typically assume

Maxims nudge equitable or efficient choices in a Trade-Off Game

The study explores whether stake levels and division schemes affect the nudging effect of the maxim in a Trade-Off Game (TOG) and found that participants were affected by maxim information in decision-making scenarios and participants showed different equity preferences as the maxim information changed, without relevance of the stake level.



The framing of games and the psychology of play

The Claiming Effect: Why Players Are More Generous in Social Dilemmas Than in Ultimatum Games

The term procedural frames is introduced and defined as different representations of structurally equivalent allocation processes. Study 1 compared 2 well-known games, sequential social dilemmas and

Rejection of unfair offers in the ultimatum game is no evidence of strong reciprocity

The prediction of an inseparable relationship between positive and negative reciprocity was rejected and there was no correlation between the participants’ tendencies to reject unfair offers in the ultimatum game and their tendencies to exhibit various prosocial behaviors in the other games, including their inclinations to positively reciprocate in the trust game.

The private rejection of unfair offers and emotional commitment

The rejection of unfair offers that increases inequity cannot be explained by the social preference for inequity aversion or reciprocity; however, it does provide support for the model of emotion as a commitment device.

Punishment and Counter-punishment in Public Good Games: Can We Still Govern Ourselves?

In the public goods literature, there have been recently a number of experiments which demonstrate how the problem of the under-provision of a public good can be solved through mutual monitoring and

An experimental analysis of ultimatum bargaining

Cooperation in social dilemmas: free riding may be thwarted by second-order reward rather than by punishment.

The authors found that people supported those who rewarded cooperators either by rewarding them or by punishing nonrewarders, but people did not support those who punished noncooperators--they did not reward punishers or punish nonpunishers.

The Name of the Game: Predictive Power of Reputations versus Situational Labels in Determining Prisoner’s Dilemma Game Moves

Two experiments explored the predictive power of reputation-based assessments versus the stated “name of the game” (Wall Street Game vs. Community Game) in determining players’ responses in an N-move Prisoner’s Dilemma and showed that the relevant labeling manipulations exerted far greater impact on the players' choice to cooperate versus defect than anticipated by the individuals who had predicted their behavior.

Egalitarian motives in humans

The results suggest that egalitarian motives affect income-altering behaviours, and may therefore be an important factor underlying the evolution of strong reciprocity and, hence, cooperation in humans.