Cost-effectiveness of current treatment strategies for lumbar spinal stenosis: nonsurgical care, laminectomy, and X-STOP.

@article{Burnett2010CosteffectivenessOC,
  title={Cost-effectiveness of current treatment strategies for lumbar spinal stenosis: nonsurgical care, laminectomy, and X-STOP.},
  author={Mark Burnett and Sherman C Stein and Ronald H.M.A. Bartels},
  journal={Journal of neurosurgery. Spine},
  year={2010},
  volume={13 1},
  pages={
          39-46
        }
}
OBJECT Standard treatment options for patients with lumbar spinal stenosis include nonoperative therapies as well as decompressive laminectomy. The introduction of interspinous decompression devices such as the X-STOP has broadened treatment options, but data comparing these treatment strategies are lacking. The object of this study was to provide a cost-effectiveness analysis of laminectomy, interspinous decompression, and nonoperative treatment for patients with lumbar stenosis. METHODS The… 

Figures and Tables from this paper

Cost-effectiveness of three treatment strategies for lumbar spinal stenosis: Conservative care, laminectomy, and the Superion interspinous spacer

Both the Spacer and DS strategies are far below the commonly cited $50,000/QALY threshold and produced several times the QALY increase versus CC, suggesting that surgical care provides superior value (cost / effectiveness) versus sustained conservative care in the treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis.

Comparing Cost-effectiveness of X-Stop With Minimally Invasive Decompression in Lumbar Spinal Stenosis: A Randomized Controlled Trial

The majority of the bootstrap samples displayed in the northeast corner of the cost-effectiveness plane, giving a 50% likelihood that X-stop is cost-effective at the extra cost of &OV0556;25,700 (incremental cost-Effectiveness ratio) for a quality-adjusted life-year.

Cost-effectiveness and Safety of Interspinous Process Decompression (Superion)

Interspinous spacer decompression using the Superion device offers a less invasive procedure for patients who fail conservative treatment before traditional decompression surgery, and reduces the direct and indirect costs associated with lumbar spinal stenosis.

interspinous spacer stenosis : Conservative care , laminectomy , and the Superion Cost-effectiveness of three treatment strategies for lumbar spinal

Both the Spacer and DS strategies are far below the commonly cited $50,000/QALY threshold and produced several times the QALY increase versus CC, suggesting that surgical care provides superior value (cost / effectiveness) versus sustained conservative care in the treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis.

The 2‐Year Cost‐Effectiveness of 3 options to Treat Lumbar Spinal Stenosis Patients

A cost‐effectiveness analysis was performed comparing mild® to ESI or laminectomy surgery, with the mild® strategy appears to be the most cost‐effective, with ESI the next best alternative at an additional $37,758/QALY.

Treatment options for lumbar spinal stenosis.

Lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) is one of the most common reasons why patients in their middle and later years seek a consultation with a neurosurgeon or spine surgeon. The surgical correction of LSS is

Cost-effectiveness of Surgical Treatment for Degenerative Spondylolisthesis and Spinal Stenosis

Limited quality data exist on cost-effective treatment of degenerative lumbar spinal conditions, despite more recent interest related to this topic, and it is important that future research efforts focus on constructing higher quality trials in this area to help determine the most cost- effective care.

The cost effectiveness of dynamic and static interspinous spacer for lumbar spinal stenosis compared with laminectomy

Static Interspinous Spacer (X-stop) appears to be the most cost-effective treatment strategy in base case scenario with success rate of LAMI (range between (55%-70%) and less than 55%) which lead to the cost effectiveness of the Coflex intervention.

Patients Undergoing 3-Level-or-Greater Decompression-Only Surgery for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis Have Similar Outcomes to Those Undergoing Single-Level Surgery at 2 Years

Patients undergoing decompression of 3 or more levels present with similar postoperative outcomes to those who undergo a single-level decompression for lumbar spinal stenosis, and under specific clinical and radiographic criteria, a multi-level laminectomy may be a safe and effective procedure with acceptable outcomes at 2 years after surgery.
...

References

SHOWING 1-10 OF 35 REFERENCES

Surgical and nonsurgical management of lumbar spinal stenosis: four-year outcomes from the maine lumbar spine study.

For the patients with severe lumbar spinal stenosis, surgical treatment was associated with greater improvement in patient-reported outcomes than nonsurgically treated treatment at 4-year evaluation, even after adjustment for differences in baseline characteristics among treatment groups.

Outcome after less-invasive decompression of lumbar spinal stenosis: a randomized comparison of unilateral laminotomy, bilateral laminotomy, and laminectomy.

Bilateral and unilateral laminotomy allowed adequate and safe decompression of lumbar stenosis, resulted in a highly significant reduction of symptoms and disability, and improved health-related quality of life.

A prospective randomized multi-center study for the treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis with the X STOP interspinous implant: 1-year results

The results of this prospective study indicate that the X STOP offers a significant improvement over non-operative therapies at 1 year with a success rate comparable to published reports for decompressive laminectomy, but with considerably lower morbidity.

X STOP versus Decompression for Neurogenic Claudication: Economic and Clinical Analysis

IPD with the X STOP implant was associated with significantly smaller direct hospital costs compared to laminectomy for the surgical treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis.

Appropriate selection of patients with lumbar spinal stenosis for interspinous process decompression with the X STOP device.

The X STOP interspinous process decompression system is a commercially available device that provides a minimally invasive alternative treatment, an intermediate option within the continuum of care for patients with moderately severe functional impairment whose symptoms are exacerbated in extension and relieved in flexion.

Lumbar spinal stenosis: conservative or surgical management?: A prospective 10-year study.

The outcome was most favorable for surgical treatment, and an initial conservative approach seems advisable for many patients because those with an unsatisfactory result can be treated surgically later with a good outcome.

Midterm outcome after unilateral approach for bilateral decompression of lumbar spinal stenosis: 5-year prospective study

For degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis unilateral approaches allowed sufficient and safe decompression of the neural structures and adequate preservation of vertebral stability, resulted in a highly significant reduction of symptoms and disability, and improved health-related quality of life.

Surgical versus nonsurgical therapy for lumbar spinal stenosis.

Patients who underwent surgery showed significantly more improvement in all primary outcomes than did patients who were treated nonsurgically, and the combined as-treated analysis showed a significant advantage for surgery by 3 months for allPrimary outcomes.

One-Year Results of X STOP Interspinous Implant for the Treatment of Lumbar Spinal Stenosis

The results of this prospective observational study indicate that X Stop offers significant short-term improvement over a 1-year period, and is a safe, effective, and less invasive alternative for treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis.

Quality of life of lumbar stenosis-treated patients in whom the X STOP interspinous device was implanted.

The results are comparable with those reported in other studies involving traditional decompressive techniques for LSS and suggest that the X STOP implant can provide an effective treatment compared with nonoperative and conventional surgical therapies.