Correction to: The essence of autism: fact or artefact?

@article{Chapman2021CorrectionTT,
  title={Correction to: The essence of autism: fact or artefact?},
  author={Robert Chapman and Walter Friedrich Veit},
  journal={Molecular Psychiatry},
  year={2021},
  volume={26},
  pages={7069 - 7069}
}
1 Citations
“The essence of autism: fact or artefact?”
TLDR
It is suggested that the fact of those familiar with the prototype being able to instantly recognise cases is equally compatible with nominalism or essentialism, and thus cannot be used to settle the debate on whether autism is a natural kind or not.