Correction: The Genetic Correlation between Height and IQ: Shared Genes or Assortative Mating?

  title={Correction: The Genetic Correlation between Height and IQ: Shared Genes or Assortative Mating?},
  author={Matthew C. Keller and Christine E. Garver-Apgar and Margaret J. Wright and Nicholas G. Martin and Robin P. Corley and Michael C. Stallings and John K Hewitt and Brendan P. Zietsch and Jonathan K. Pritchard},
  journal={PLoS Genetics},
The first sentence under the heading ‘‘The genetic correlation between height and IQ: Shared genes or assortative mating?’’ in the Results section is incorrect and should read ‘‘We estimate that the additive genetic correlation between height and IQ is .13 in males :08= ffiffiffiffiffiffi :59 p | ffiffiffiffiffiffi :69 p and .22 in females :15= ð ffiffiffiffiffiffi :65 p | ffiffiffiffiffiffi :70 p Þ, and these estimates were highly significant (x(3) = 47.4, p = 2.8e-10).’’ 
1 Citations

Figures and Tables from this paper

Toward Emically Informed Cross-Cultural Comparisons

Current-day cross-cultural psychology typically attends to a linguistic equivalence requirement for the assessment of one and the same psychological construct in different cultures. The present



Resolving the genetic and environmental sources of the correlation between height and intelligence: a study of nearly 2600 Norwegian male twin pairs.

A major part of the height--intelligence correlation was due to correlated shared environments, but statistically significant effects of correlated genes and nonshared environments were also found.

Direct and indirect IQ heritability estimates: A puzzle

Factors such as nonadditive genetic variance, assortative mating, selective placement, measurement error, age differences, and genotype-environment correlation and interaction do not obviously explain the difference between direct and indirect IQ heritability estimates.

Resolving the effects of phenotype and social background on mate selection

Power simulations show that it will be feasible to resolve the contributions of phenotype and social background to mate selection for variables such as IQ, education, and attitudes for which the marital correlation is moderately high.

How should we explain variation in the genetic variance of traits?

I compiled information from the literature on the mutational and standing genetic variances in outbred populations, inferred the relative mutational target size of each trait, its a timing of expression, and used models of life history to calculate fitness sensitivities for each trait.

Common SNPs explain a large proportion of the heritability for human height

Evidence is provided that the remaining heritability is due to incomplete linkage disequilibrium between causal variants and genotyped SNPs, exacerbated by causal variants having lower minor allele frequency than the SNPs explored to date.

Multifactorial inheritance with cultural transmission and assortative mating. II. a general model of combined polygenic and cultural inheritance.

A general linear model of combined polygenic-cultural inheritance allows for phenotypic assortative mating, common environment, maternal and paternal effects, and genic-cultural correlation, and conservative, but robust, approach to the use of environmental indices.

Genetic contributions to the association between height and intelligence: evidence from Dutch twin data from childhood to middle age

The results show that the association between height and IQ should not be directly regarded as evidence for childhood living conditions affecting IQ, but the effect of genetic factors affecting independently or interacting with environmental factors should be considered as well.

Assortative mating by body height and BMI: Finnish Twins and their spouses

The results show that assortative mating needs to be considered in population genetic studies of body height and weight and shared environmental factors had no effect on phenotypic variation in body height or BMI.

Heritability of adult body height: a comparative study of twin cohorts in eight countries.

The results indicate that, in general, there are only minor differences in the genetic architecture of height between affluent Caucasian populations, especially among men.


This study demonstrates that homogamy is present at the level of preferences for both sexes, and shows that measurements of the function describing thishomogamy are concordant with several distinct mating rules proposed in the literature.