Correcting the Scientific Record: Retraction Practices in Chemistry and Materials Science

@article{Coudert2019CorrectingTS,
  title={Correcting the Scientific Record: Retraction Practices in Chemistry and Materials Science},
  author={François-Xavier Coudert},
  journal={Chemistry of Materials},
  year={2019},
  volume={31},
  pages={3593-3598}
}
For how long and with what relevance do genetics articles retracted due to research misconduct remain active in the scientific literature
TLDR
Although most retractions were appropriately handled by journals, the gravest issue was that median time to retraction for articles retracted for falsification/fabrication was nearly 5 years, earning close to 6800 post-retraction citations. Expand
Multiple co-first authors, co-corresponding authors and co-supervisors: a synthesis of shared authorship credit
PurposeAuthorship is the ultimate status of intellectual recognition in academic publishing. Although fairly robust guidelines have already been in place for a considerable amount of time regardingExpand
Understanding and Predicting Retractions of Published Work
TLDR
This study believes to be the first of its kind to demonstrate the utility of machine learning as a tool for the assessment of retracted work and develops a random forest classifier to predict retraction in new samples with 73% accuracy and F1-score of 71%. Expand
Plagiarism, Fake Peer-Review, and Duplication: Predominant Reasons Underlying Retractions of Iran-Affiliated Scientific Papers
TLDR
The Retraction Watch Database was searched to enumerate the retracted Iran-affiliated papers from December 2001 to December 2019 and the predominant reasons for retractions were outlined, with Duplication, plagiarism, and fake peer-review being the most frequent reasons. Expand
Revisiting the Ethical Aspects in Research Publications
Increasing peer-pressure for publishing research articles accounts for the several instances of misconducts in the form of fabrication, falsification, plagiarism, salami slicing and authorshipExpand
The Journal of Nanoparticle Research victim of an organized rogue editor network!
Following attacks on large companies, government bodies, and political parties, will scientific journals be the next victims of large-scale and complex hacks? As far as we know, this has neverExpand
The limitations of retraction notices and the heroic acts of authors who correct the scholarly record: An analysis of retractions of papers published from 1975 to 2019
  • Q. Vuong
  • Political Science, Computer Science
  • Learn. Publ.
  • 2020
TLDR
Retraction notices need to be more informative; limitation sections ought to be a required and even an open section of all published articles; and promoting ‘heroic acts’ in science can positively change the current publishing culture. Expand
Corrective factors for author- and journal-based metrics impacted by citations to accommodate for retractions
TLDR
This work describes ways to correct the JIF, CiteScore, the 5-year Impact Factor, Immediacy Index, Cited Half-Life, Raw Impact per Paper and other JBMs (Eigenfactor Score and Article Influence Score) as well as the h-index, one of the most widespread ABMs, depending on the number of retractions for that journal or individual. Expand