Correcting a metacognitive error: feedback increases retention of low-confidence correct responses.

@article{Butler2008CorrectingAM,
  title={Correcting a metacognitive error: feedback increases retention of low-confidence correct responses.},
  author={Andrew C. Butler and Jeffrey D. Karpicke and Henry L. Roediger},
  journal={Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition},
  year={2008},
  volume={34 4},
  pages={
          918-28
        }
}
Previous studies investigating posttest feedback have generally conceptualized feedback as a method for correcting erroneous responses, giving virtually no consideration to how feedback might promote learning of correct responses. Here, the authors show that when correct responses are made with low confidence, feedback serves to correct this initial metacognitive error, enhancing retention of low-confidence correct responses. In 2 experiments, subjects took an initial multiple-choice test on… 

Figures and Tables from this paper

Beyond hypercorrection: remembering corrective feedback for low-confidence errors*

TLDR
It is found that for some types of material, there is an effortful process of elaboration and problem solving prior to making low-confidence errors that facilitates memory of corrective feedback.

Learning from feedback: Spacing and the delay-retention effect.

TLDR
An experiment involving cued recall of trivia facts tested several theories of feedback-timing effects and also examined the effects of restudy and retest trials following immediate and delayed feedback, supporting a theoretical account assuming that delaying feedback strengthens initially correct responses due to the spacing of encoding opportunities.

Scaffolding feedback to maximize long-term error correction

TLDR
It is demonstrated that scaffolded feedback gave rise to the best memory for the correct answers at a delay, and tests of the maintenance of the corrections over a 30-min delay and over a 1-day delay demonstrated this.

The Effect of Type of Feedback in Multiple-Choice Testing on Long-Term Retention

TLDR
Even participants who received Feedback 3 outperformed the control group, regardless of whether feedback followed correct or incorrect responses, in this investigated how different types of feedback in multiple-choice testing influence long-term retention.

The influence of feedback on predictions of future memory performance

TLDR
The current experiments suggest that participants may understand that feedback is beneficial, but receiving feedback diminishes prediction accuracy for specific items and participants do not appreciate the magnitude of the benefits of feedback.

Prior knowledge is more predictive of error correction than subjective confidence

TLDR
The results suggest that prior knowledge likely plays a primary role in error correction, while confidence may play a small role or merely serve as a proxy for prior knowledge.

The Influence of Corrective Feedback on Retrieval-induced Forgetting

Prior research has shown that testing can impair subsequent recall of nontested materials: an effect termed retrieval-induced forgetting. In the current study, I examined the effect of providing

The hypercorrection effect persists over a week, but high-confidence errors return

TLDR
Findings help to contextualize the hypercorrection effect within the broader memory literature by showing that high-confidence errors are more likely to be corrected, but they are also morelikely to be reproduced if the correct answer is forgotten.
...

References

SHOWING 1-10 OF 62 REFERENCES

Remembering Responses and Cognitive Estimates of Knowing: The Effects of Instructions, Retrieval Sequences, and Feedback☆

Two experiments examined the effects of feedback on a person's ability to recall their responses to multiple-choice items and the confidence with which they made those responses within the context of

The correction of errors committed with high confidence

Most theories predict that when people indicate that they are highly confident they are producing their strongest responses. Hence, if such a high confidence response is in error it should be

Errors committed with high confidence are hypercorrected.

TLDR
The relation between people's confidence in the accuracy of an erroneous response and their later performance was investigated and it was found that highly confident errors were the most likely to be corrected in a subsequent retest.

The Instructional Effect of Feedback in Test-Like Events

Feedback is an essential construct for many theories of learning and instruction, and an understanding of the conditions for effective feedback should facilitate both theoretical development and

The effect of type and timing of feedback on learning from multiple-choice tests.

TLDR
This research suggests that delaying the presentation of feedback after a test is beneficial to learning because of the spaced presentation of information.

Feedback enhances the positive effects and reduces the negative effects of multiple-choice testing

TLDR
Investigating whether feedback could be used to boost the positive effects and reduce the negative effects of multiple-choice testing found both immediate and delayed feedback increased the proportion of correct responses and reduced theportion of intrusions on a delayed cued recall test.

Not all errors are created equal: metacognition and changing answers on multiple-choice tests.

  • P. HighamC. Gerrard
  • Psychology
    Canadian journal of experimental psychology = Revue canadienne de psychologie experimentale
  • 2005
TLDR
The results suggest that future research on answer changing should more closely consider the metacognitive factors underlying answer changing, using Type 2 signal-detection theory to isolate these aspects of performance.

When does feedback facilitate learning of words?

TLDR
Supplying the correct answer after an incorrect response not only improved performance during the initial learning session--it also increased final retention by 494% and made little difference either immediately or at a delay, regardless of whether the subject was confident in the response.

Impoverished cue support enhances subsequent retention: Support for the elaborative retrieval explanation of the testing effect

TLDR
It is suggested that an intervening test may be most beneficial to final retention when it provides more potential for elaborative processing.
...