Corporate Governance, Takeovers, and Top-Management Compensation: Theory and Evidence

@article{Cyert2002CorporateGT,
  title={Corporate Governance, Takeovers, and Top-Management Compensation: Theory and Evidence},
  author={Richard M. Cyert and Sok-Hyon Kang and Praveen Kumar},
  journal={Manag. Sci.},
  year={2002},
  volume={48},
  pages={453-469}
}
We examine, both theoretically and empirically, top-management compensation in the presence of agency conflicts when shareholders have delegated governance responsibilities to a self-interested Board of Directors (BOD). We develop a theoretical framework that explicitly incorporates the BOD as a strategic player, models the negotiation process between the CEO and the BOD in designing CEO compensation, and considers the impact of potential takeovers by large shareholders monitoring the CEO-BOD… 
Market versus Internal Factors in Corporate Governance
There is a long-standing distinction in the corporate governance literature between market and internal factors that drive firm performance. In their seminal formulation of the separation between
Top managers’ compensation and governance in Spanish firms: Evidence and reflections
In Spanish listed firms, taking into account the predominant modes of ownership structure, which are characterized by a high concentration of shares in the hands of a few shareholders who are
The role of corporate governance and dividend policy as an alignment mechanisms to CEO compensation and firm's performance
Public perception of CEO compensation is evidently unfair as inefficient compensation structures that violate the rights of shareholders result in principal-agent problems. In order to mitigate this
Governance Bundles, Firm Performance, and the Substitutability and Complementarity of Governance Mechanisms
Manuscript Type: Conceptual Research Question/Issue: This paper extends the theory of bundles of corporate governance mechanisms to address agency issues within the Anglo-Saxon system of
Shareholder Rights, Boards, and CEO Compensation
I analyze the role of executive compensation in corporate governance. As proxies for corporate governance, I use board size, board independence, CEO-chair duality, institutional ownership
Shareholder Rights, Boards, and CEO Compensation*
I analyze the role of executive compensation in corporate governance. As proxies for corporate governance, I use board size, board independence, CEO-chair duality, institutional ownership
The role and effect of corporate governance and remuneration consultants on CEO compensation : empirical evidence from UK companies
This thesis investigates the role and effect of different aspects of corporate governance, ownership structure and remuneration consultants on determining the level and the structure of CEO
Executive compensation and ownership structure : Empirical evidence for Italian listed companies
This paper investigates the determinants of executive compensation in Italian listed companies over the period 1995 – 2002. Using a unique database, with yearly data on executive pay and very
How (if any) Uniform Corporate Governance Measures Matter for Executive Compensation Practice at Closely-Held Banks
The aim of this paper is to examine the executive compensation practices in closely-held financial institutions where the corporate governance conflict lies between the blockholder on one hand and
Board compensation and ownership structure: empirical evidence for Italian listed companies
This paper investigates the relationships among corporate ownership, the level of board compensation, and firms’ future performance within Italian listed companies. Board compensation could be
...
1
2
3
4
5
...

References

SHOWING 1-10 OF 53 REFERENCES
Corporate governance, chief executive officer compensation, and firm performance 1 The financial sup
Abstract We find that measures of board and ownership structure explain a significant amount of cross-sectional variation in CEO compensation, after controlling for standard economic determinants of
Shareholder Activism and Corporate Governance in the United States
I survey corporate governance activity by institutional investors in the United States, and the empirical evidence on whether this activity affects firm performance. A small number of American
Stakeholder Pressure and the Structure of Executive Compensation
We examine whether the recent public outcry over executive compensation has had an impact on the level of executive compensation and/or the sensitivity of cash compensation to firm performance.
Agency Theory, Managerial Welfare, and Takeover Bid Resistance
Tender offers provide an ideal setting for the analysis of agency relationships since the best interests of the principal (target firm shareholders) and agent (target firm managers) are often in
Contracts and the Market for Executives
The paper reviews empirical findings on executive compensation in light of marginal productivity and contract theories. The executive labor market performs three functions. First, control must be
Are CEOS Really Paid Like Bureaucrats?
A common view of CEO compensation is that there is essentially no correlation between firm performance and CEO pay. This calls into question an important component of effective corporate governance.
The Market for Corporate Control: The Scientific Evidence
This paper reviews much of the scientific literature on the market for corporate control. The evidence indicates that corporate takeovers generate positive gains, that target firm shareholders
Large Shareholders and Corporate Control
In a corporation with many small owners, it may not pay any one of them to monitor the performance of the management. We explore a model in which the presence of a large minority shareholder provides
Performance Pay and Top Management Incentives
Our estimates of the pay-performance relation (including pay, options, stockholdings, and dismissal) for chief executive officers indicate that CEO wealth changes $3.25 for every $1,000 change in
Investment Opportunities and the Structure of Performance-based Executive Compensation
The contracting paradigm advanced in Smith and Watts (1992) suggests that both the risk-sharing and incentive consequences of performance-contingent compensation depend on the extent that investment
...
1
2
3
4
5
...