Copernicus and the Origin of his Heliocentric System

@article{Goldstein2002CopernicusAT,
  title={Copernicus and the Origin of his Heliocentric System},
  author={Bernard R. Jos{\'e} Goldstein},
  journal={Journal for the History of Astronomy},
  year={2002},
  volume={33},
  pages={219 - 235}
}
  • B. R. Goldstein
  • Published 1 August 2002
  • Philosophy
  • Journal for the History of Astronomy
L'introduction d'un systeme heliocentrique par Copernic etait a l'epoque consideree comme revolutionnaire pour la cosmologie traditionnelle et apparait comme etant un evenement globalement marquant de l'histoire des sciences. Mais quelle etait la base de la recherche qui a abouti a l'heliocentrisme ? L'auteur explore les raisons qui ont pousse Copernic a rejeter les principes relatifs aux distances cosmiques et au systeme geocentrique dans lequel ils etaient ancres. 

Figures from this paper

The (likely) Last Edition of Copernicus’s Libri revolutionum
Review essay of Nicolas Copernic, De revolutionibus orbium coelestium, Des revolutions des orbes celestes. 3 volumes. Science et Humanisme, Collection published under the patronage of the Association
Copernicus's Development in Context: Politics, Astrology, Cosmology and a Prince-Bishopric
Argument During the two decades before the turning point in Copernicus's personal and scientific development in 1510, he had experience of political activity which has been largely ignored by the
The Copernican Question Revisited: A Reply to Noel Swerdlow and John Heilbron
The Copernican Question advances a radical reinterpretation of a classic episode in the history of science. Copernicus's turn to the heliocentric planetary arrangement occurred in the context of a
Copernicus's Path to His Cosmology: An Attempted Reconstruction
Copernicus's Commentariolus begins by complaining that, while the ancients had wanted astronomy to obey the principle of uniform motion in perfect circles, Ptolemy's equant violates this principle.
Goddu’s Copernicus: An Essay Review of André Goddu’s Copernicus and the Aristotelian Tradition⋆
For some 20 years, André Goddu has made important contributions to Copernicus studies as well as to a wide range of scholarship in medieval history. His work is distinguished by a formidable and
Why was Copernicus a Copernican?
Here is an outstanding intellectual scandal in the history of science: there is no generally agreed and historically respectable answer to the question of why Nicholas Copernicus adopted
Before Copernicus and Copernicus
  • Matjaž Vesel
  • Aestimatio: Sources and Studies in the History of Science
  • 2021
A discussion of Before Copernicus: The Cultures and Contexts of Scientific Learning in the Fifteenth Century edited by Rivka Feldhay and F. Jamil Ragep. Published Online (2021-04-30)Copyright © 2021
The Significance of the Erosion of the Prohibition against Metabasis to the Success and Legacy of the Copernican Revolution
Although one would not wish to classify Copernicus’ own intentions as belonging to the late-medieval and Renaissance tradition of nominalist philosophy, if we are to turn our consideration to what
cAlīqushjī and Regiomontanus: Eccentric Transformations and Copernican Revolutions
In 1973, Noel Swerdlow presented a new and significant reconstruction ofhow Copernicus arrived at the heliocentric theory. I This reconstruction was based upon several bits of newly-interpreted
COPERNICUS' FIRST FRIENDS: PHYSICAL COPERNICANISM FROM 1543 TO 1610
Between the appearance of Copernicus’ De Revolutionibus in 1543 and the works of Kepler and Galileo that appeared in 1609–10, there were probably no more than a dozen converts to physical
...
1
2
3
...

References

SHOWING 1-10 OF 42 REFERENCES
On the Planetary Theory of Copernicus
In 1958 A. Koyre spoke about “l’abandon de l’equant, ce haut titre de gloire de l’astronomie copernicienne”, adding that in the lunar theory “Copernic reussit la simplification la plus grande en la
Copernicus and the Critics of Ptolemy
L'A. decrit et analyse le realisme de Copernic dans ses travaux de recherche sur l'astronomie ainsi que les critiques de Ptolemee dans la prediction de la position des planetes
The role of Rothmann in the dissolution of the celestial spheres
La dissolution des spheres celestes est generalement attribuee a Tycho Brahe. Cependant, C. Rothmann y apporta une contribution encore imprecise, que l'A. vet eclaircir en montrant la place de
Averroes' De Caelo Ibn Rushd's Cosmology in his Commentaries on Aristotle's On the Heavens
Averroes defended philosophy by returning to the true Aristotle. For this purpose, Aristotle's book “On the Heaven,” in which he explained the eternity, uniqueness and movement of the universe,
see O
  • Neugebauer, “On the planetary theory of Copernicus”, Vistas in astronomy, x (1968), 89–103 (espec. pp. 92–96), reprinted in idem, Astronomy and history: Selected essays
  • 1983
The Arabic Version of Ptolemy's Planetary Hypotheses
Scottus Eriugena, Sun-eentred planets, and Carolingian astronomy", Journal for the history ofastronomy
  • xxxii
  • 2001
III (slightly modified). Cf L Victruvii Pollionis ad Cesarem Augustum De architectura liber primus
  • Ten books on architecture, trans!. by Ingrid D. Rowland, commentary and illustrations by Thomas Noble Howe
  • 1999
Vitruvius, Ten books on architecture, trans
  • III (slightly modified). Cf L Victruvii Pollionis ad Cesarem Augustum De architectura liber primus[-decimus] (Rome,
  • 1999
Averroes’ De caelo
  • Ibn Rushd’s cosmology in his Commentaries on Aristotle’s On the heavens”, Arabic sciences and philosophy,
  • 1995
...
1
2
3
4
5
...