Coordination and Measurement: What We Get Wrong About What Reichenbach Got Right
@inproceedings{Padovani2017CoordinationAM, title={Coordination and Measurement: What We Get Wrong About What Reichenbach Got Right}, author={F. Padovani}, year={2017} }
In his Scientific Representation (2008), van Fraassen argues that measuring is a form of representation. In fact, every measurement pinpoints its target in accordance with specific operational rules within an already-constructed theoretical space, in which certain conceptual interconnections can be represented. Reichenbach’s 1920 account of coordination is particularly interesting in this connection. Even though recent reassessments of this account do not do full justice to some important… Expand
Topics from this paper
2 Citations
From successful measurement to the birth of a law: Disentangling coordination in Ohm's scientific practice.
- Computer Science, Medicine
- Studies in history and philosophy of science
- 2020
References
SHOWING 1-10 OF 16 REFERENCES
Reichenbach on causality in 1923: Scientific inference, coordination, and confirmation.
- Sociology, Medicine
- Studies in history and philosophy of science
- 2015
- 2
Making Time: A Study in the Epistemology of Measurement
- Sociology
- The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science
- 2016
- 31
- PDF
Relativizing the relativized a priori: Reichenbach’s axioms of coordination divided
- Mathematics, Computer Science
- Synthese
- 2009
- 25
- PDF