Controversies in Initial Management of Open Fractures.

Abstract

BACKGROUND Treatment of open fractures continues to be a challenge for orthopedic and trauma surgeons, and early treatment recommendations, which persist in the literature for decades, often do not have supporting data. METHODS This is a critical review of the literature surrounding controversies in the initial management of open fractures. It also focuses on the utility of negative pressure dressings in the care of associated complex wounds. Studies were selected based on their relevance to the treatment of open fractures. RESULTS A total of 40 studies were included. The following topics were critically discussed: timing of initial debridement, antibiotic coverage, utility of obtaining cultures, and timing of wound closure. CONCLUSION The majority of open fractures require urgent, not emergent, irrigation and debridement. Antibiotics are essential in preventing infection in open fractures. Timely wound closure after all necrotic tissue has been debrided decreases complications in open fractures. Finally, negative pressure wound therapy has dramatically changed the care of associated complex wounds.

Statistics

0200040002014201520162017
Citations per Year

1,492 Citations

Semantic Scholar estimates that this publication has 1,492 citations based on the available data.

See our FAQ for additional information.

Cite this paper

@article{Ryan2014ControversiesII, title={Controversies in Initial Management of Open Fractures.}, author={Scott P Ryan and Vito L Pugliano}, journal={Scandinavian journal of surgery : SJS : official organ for the Finnish Surgical Society and the Scandinavian Surgical Society}, year={2014}, volume={103 2}, pages={132-137} }