Contrast-enhanced US evaluation in patients with blunt abdominal trauma().


INTRODUCTION To evaluate the use of contrast-enhanced ultrasonography (CEUS) in patients with blunt abdominal trauma. MATERIALS AND METHODS A total of 133 hemodynamically stable patients were evaluated using ultrasonography (US), CEUS and multislice Computer Tomography (CT) da eliminare. RESULTS In 133 patients, CT identified 84 lesions: 48 cases of splenic injury, 21 of liver injury, 13 of kidney or adrenal gland injury and 2 of pancreatic injury. US identified free fluid or parenchymal abnormalities in 59/84 patients positive at CT and free fluid in 20/49 patients negative at CT. CEUS revealed 81/84 traumatic injuries identified at CT and ruled out traumatic injuries in 48/49 negative at CT. Sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values for US were 70.2%, 59.2%, 74.7% and 53.7%, respectively; for CEUS the values were 96.4%, 98%, 98.8% and 94.1%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS The study showed that CEUS is more accurate than US and nearly as accurate as CT, and CEUS can therefore be proposed for the initial evaluation of patients with blunt abdominal trauma.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jus.2010.06.002
Citations per Year

1,130 Citations

Semantic Scholar estimates that this publication has 1,130 citations based on the available data.

See our FAQ for additional information.

Cite this paper

@article{Valentino2010ContrastenhancedUE, title={Contrast-enhanced US evaluation in patients with blunt abdominal trauma().}, author={Massimo Valentino and Carlo De Luca and Stefania Sartoni Galloni and Mirco Branchini and Cecilia Modolon and Pietro Pavlica and Libero Barozzi}, journal={Journal of ultrasound}, year={2010}, volume={13 1}, pages={22-7} }