Continuous or intermittent feeding: pros and cons

@article{Bear2018ContinuousOI,
  title={Continuous or intermittent feeding: pros and cons},
  author={Danielle E. Bear and Nicholas Hart and Zudin A. Puthucheary},
  journal={Current Opinion in Critical Care},
  year={2018},
  volume={24},
  pages={256–261}
}
Purpose of review There has been a recent shift in the focus of providing nutrition support to critically ill adults towards enhancing recovery and promoting survivorship. With this has come an evaluation of our current approaches to nutrition support, which includes whether continuous feeding is optimal, particularly for reducing muscle wasting, but also for managing blood glucose levels and feeding intolerance and at the organizational level. This review will discuss the pros and cons of… 

Are periods of feeding and fasting protective during critical illness?

TLDR
These findings open perspectives for the design and clinical validation of intermittent feeding regimens for critically ill patients, and the optimal mode and duration of the fasting interval, if any, remain unclear.

Comparison of sequential feeding and continuous feeding on the blood glucose of critically ill patients: a non-inferiority randomized controlled trial

TLDR
In this non-inferiority study, the average blood glucose in SF was not inferior to that in CF, and SF may be as safe as CF for critically ill patients.

Continuous versus Intermittent Enteral Tube Feeding for Critically Ill Patients: A Prospective, Randomized Controlled Trial

TLDR
For patients undergoing mechanical ventilation, continuous enteral feeding significantly improved the achievement of target nutrition requirements.

Intermittent versus continuous tube feeding in patients with hemorrhagic stroke: a randomized controlled clinical trial

TLDR
Continuous tube feeding was an effective way to improve the tolerance of enteral nutrition in patients with hemorrhagic stroke but no enough evidence was found to support the advantage in calorie intake of continuous tube feeding in this study.

Changing paradigms in metabolic support and nutrition therapy during critical illness.

TLDR
These new findings will probably change the practice of metabolic and nutrition therapy in critical illness and challenge paradigms advocated for long.

Comparison of continuous versus intermittent enteral nutrition in critically ill patients (COINN): study protocol for a randomized comparative effectiveness trial

TLDR
Whether the mode of application of enteral nutrition affects the time to reach nutritional targets, signs of intolerance, and complications is evaluated in critically ill adult patients receiving enteral Nutrition COINN.

Exploring the Potential Effectiveness of Combining Optimal Nutrition With Electrical Stimulation to Maintain Muscle Health in Critical Illness: A Narrative Review

  • S. ParryL. ChappleM. Mourtzakis
  • Medicine
    Nutrition in clinical practice : official publication of the American Society for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition
  • 2018
TLDR
The potential role of nutrition and EMS in maintaining muscle health in critical illness is explored and fundamental concepts of muscle wasting are evaluated and the effects of EMS, as well as the effectsof nutrition therapy on muscle health and the clinical and functional outcomes in critically ill patients are evaluated.

Intragastric prepyloric enteral nutrition, bolus vs continuous in the adult patient: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

  • T. BolgeoR. Di Matteo A. Maconi
  • Medicine
    Nutrition in clinical practice : official publication of the American Society for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition
  • 2022
TLDR
Evaluated trials of patients aged ≥18 years with preserved gastrointestinal function found intermittent EN appears to reduce the incidence of aspiration in the hospital setting; however, it may increase the risk of diarrhea.

References

SHOWING 1-10 OF 25 REFERENCES

The role of nutritional support in the physical and functional recovery of critically ill patients: a narrative review

TLDR
With survivorship at the forefront of critical care research, it is imperative that nutrition studies carefully consider biological mechanisms and trial design because these factors can strongly influence outcomes, in particular long-term physical and functional outcome.

Bolus vs. continuous feeding to optimize anabolism in neonates

TLDR
This review reports on recent findings that bolus is advantageous compared to continuous feeding in supporting optimal protein anabolism and enhances protein synthesis more than continuous feeding and promotes greater protein anabolic activity.

Prospective Randomized Control Trial of Intermittent Versus Continuous Gastric Feeds for Critically Ill Trauma Patients

TLDR
This study compared an intermittent feeding regimen (one-sixth of daily needs infused every 4 hours) with a continuous (drip) feeding regimen for critically ill trauma patients with a noninjured gastrointestinal tract.

Effects of continuous versus bolus infusion of enteral nutrition in critical patients.

TLDR
The two groups were similar in this regard, without statistical differences, probably because of meticulous technique, careful monitoring, strict patient matching, and conservative amounts of diet employed in both situations.

Comparison of continuous vs intermittent nasogastric enteral feeding in trauma patients: perceptions and practice.

TLDR
Data from this study suggest that CENS through a nasoenteric feeding tube may facilitate nutrient intake with less gastrointestinal complications in severely injured trauma patients compared with IENS.

Optimising enteral nutrition in critically ill patients by reducing fasting times

TLDR
It is concluded that the introduction of a simple guideline stipulating reduced fasting times before ICU procedures can result in less time lost in feed interruptions and improved enteral nutrition delivery.

Comparison of Intermittent and Bolus Enteral Feeding Methods on Enteral Feeding Intolerance of Patients with Sepsis: A Triple-blind Controlled Trial in Intensive Care Units

TLDR
Bolus method can still be used as a standard method to decrease the risk of enteral feeding intolerance if it is used properly, and no statistically significant difference was found between all variables in the three studied groups during the 3 days.

Intermittent enteral feeding: the influence on respiratory and digestive tract colonization in mechanically ventilated intensive-care-unit patients.

TLDR
Almost all patients receiving enteral feeding are colonized in the stomach with gram-negative bacteria, and IEF resulted in a slight decrease in intragastric pH without influencing rates of colonization and infection of the respiratory tract.

Trial of the route of early nutritional support in critically ill adults.

TLDR
A pragmatic, randomized trial involving adults with an unplanned admission to one of 33 English intensive care units found no significant difference in 30-day mortality associated with the route of delivery of early nutritional support in critically ill adults.

The Effect of Continuous Enteral Nutrition on Nutrition Indices, Compared to the Intermittent and Combination Enteral Nutrition in Traumatic Brain Injury Patients.

TLDR
The continuous method, having a positive effect on nitrogen balance, reducing hypercatabolism and maintaining the total body protein, was preferred to brain injury patients compared with intermittent enteral and parenteral methods that demand more studies.