Continuous Improvement of the QM Rubric and Review Processes: Scholarship of Integration and Application

  title={Continuous Improvement of the QM Rubric and Review Processes: Scholarship of Integration and Application},
  author={Kay Shattuck and Whitney Alicia Zimmerman and Deborah Elaine Adair},
Quality Matters (QM) is a faculty-centered, peer review process that is designed to certify the quality of online and blended courses. QM is a leader in quality assurance for online education and has received national recognition for its scalable, peer-based approach and continuous improvement in online education and student learning. Regular, robust review and refreshment of the QM RubricTM and processes keep them current, practical, and applicable across academic disciplines and academic… Expand

Figures from this paper

Evaluating Online Course Quality: A Study on Implementation of Course Quality Standards
This study examined the relationship of intentional faculty professional development, intentional online course design, and informal course reviews to the results of official interinstitutional peerExpand
Universal Design for Learning and the Quality Matters Guidelines for the Design and Implementation of Online Learning Events.
The goal of this practical summary is to provide guidance about elements that are recommended to faculty as they plan for highly effective, goal oriented and interactive online instruction and student learning. Expand
Internationalizing Quality Matters™: The China Case
The success of the Quality Matters (QM)TM program, especially acceptance of the QM RubricTM in the United States, has attracted increasing international attention. Plans to translate and disseminateExpand
Developing an International Pool of Certified Quality Reviewers
ABSTRACT This article covers the origins, growth, rationale, calibration, and inspiration of an international pool of certified Quality MattersTM (QM) Peer Reviewers. From the beginning in 2003, as aExpand
The Intersection of Exemplar Professional Accreditation Standards and Quality Matters Rubric Standards for Best Practice in Distance Education
The process of accreditation is a systematic review through which the public may be assured that an institution provides quality education. Accrediting bodies typically address the quality of theExpand
Students’ Perceptions of Online Course Quality: How Do They Measure Up to the Research?
The Quality Matters (QM)TM rubric presents a set of research-based standards on which to judge the quality of online courses. The authors of this study investigated how students’ perceptions ofExpand
Structuring Online Instruction by Dynamic Design, Delivery, and Assessment
Over 900 colleges and universities across the U.S. have adopted the Quality Matters Rubric for the design of their online courses with the intention of providing guidance to both instructors and peerExpand
Building Better Courses: Examining the Content Validity of the iNACOL National Standards for Quality Online Courses
This study compares all elements under the five main standards to contemporary K-12 or higher education online course literature and concludes with suggested changes and additions. Expand
This study examined the experiences and perceptions of a group of sixteen faculty members who participated in a comprehensive faculty development process for online teaching and learning developedExpand
Educator's Learning Alignment Instrument (ELAI): A tool to assess aligned learning concepts within college courses.
The ELAI is a nonburdensome instrument that can facilitate faculty reflection on how aligned learning concepts are applied in a course and provide novel data to assess general learning focus within college courses and within programs. Expand


Boyer's Expanded Definitions of Scholarship, the Standards for Assessing Scholarship, and the Elusiveness of the Scholarship of Teaching
  • C. E. Glassick
  • Sociology, Medicine
  • Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges
  • 2000
The author summarizes the work of the Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching on Scholarship Reconsidered and Scholarship Assessed and reviews the more recent work of Lee Shulman on the scholarship of teaching. Expand
A community of practice approach to the development of non-traditional learners through networked learning
The authors' analysis demonstrates that students belong to an overarching community of practice, with different subsets who work at sharing and co-constructing common understandings, which helps create a safe interaction space for the students. Expand
The Scholarship of Teaching and Learning Reconsidered: Institutional Integration and Impact
Preface ix About the Authors xvii Executive Summary xix 1 Why the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning Matters Today 1 2 Teachers and Learning 24 3 The Scholarship of Teaching and Learning,Expand
A learning college for the 21st century
Many earlier attempts at education reform have failed, causing some critics to call for a much more expansive wave of reform in which learning becomes a central focus. O'Banion presents an argumentExpand
Bulding Knowledge for Teaching and Learning: The Promise of Scholarship in a Networked Environment
oberto Corrada’s labor law course at the University of Denver embodies both growing interest in new approaches to teaching and learning and R some of the latest uses of educational technology in theExpand
Designs for network learning: a communities of practice perspective
This article explores the relevance for network learning of themes developed by Wenger, initially with Lave and subsequently alone. While Wenger’s fieldwork is located in the workplace, he sees hisExpand
Defining scholarship for the discipline of nursing. American Association of Colleges of Nursing.
  • Medicine
  • Journal of professional nursing : official journal of the American Association of Colleges of Nursing
  • 1999
The application of the standards proposed in this document will differ by institution, yet the standards themselves will provide a framework for the advancement of nursing knowledge, which ultimately will improve the health of all people. Expand
The Politics of Responsibility: A Theory of Program Planning Practice for Adult Education
This article proposes a theory of program planning practice that takes power and interests as central to action and asks what educators can do to plan responsibly. Program planning is defined as aExpand
Beyond scholarship reconsidered: Toward an enlarged vision of the scholarly work of faculty members
Ernest Boyer’s 1990 Carnegie report, Scholarship Reconsidered, is examined as a “tipping point”—a critical turning point in what is fundamentally valued and rewarded in the scholarly work of facultyExpand