Contiguous States, Stable Borders and the Peace between Democracies

@article{Gibler2014ContiguousSS,
  title={Contiguous States, Stable Borders and the Peace between Democracies},
  author={Douglas M Gibler},
  journal={International Studies Quarterly},
  year={2014},
  volume={58},
  pages={126-129}
}
  • Douglas M Gibler
  • Published 1 March 2014
  • Political Science
  • International Studies Quarterly
Park and Colaresi find that border stability does not apply to non-contiguous states. This just confirms, again, an argument I have been making in numerous publications since my original “Bordering on Peace” article. Nevertheless, I use this response to present a replication of my original argument, as it applies to contiguous states, and I find strong support for the contention that the democratic peace can better be understood as a stable border peace. I also discuss several different… 

Tables from this paper

The Cart and the Horse Redux: The Timing of Border Settlement and Joint Democracy

Do democratic dyads handle their disputes more peacefully than non-democratic dyads, or have they cleared the most contentious issues (that is, unsettled borders) off their foreign policy agenda

Foundations for integrating the democratic and territorial peace arguments

The democratic and territorial peace arguments explain interstate peace via distinct mechanisms. Yet they can be integrated. I theoretically derive both the unique domains in which each argument

Make Two Democracies and Call Me in the Morning: Endogenous Regime Type and the Democratic Peace

The rarity of violent conflict betweenpairs of democracies has often been attributed to a pacifying effect of democracy. As democracy and peacemay have common causes, however, scholars have also

Peaceful dyads: A territorial perspective

ABSTRACT Many dyads develop peaceful relationships, avoiding war for long, historical periods. Are such dyads common? How many exist, and why have they never fought? This study provides a territorial

External threat and the limits of democratic pacifism

Scholars widely recognize that democratic dyads are associated with lower hazards of armed conflict and more efficient conflict resolution. Many attempts have been made to challenge the notion of

Territorial designs and international politics: the diverging constitution of space and boundaries

ABSTRACT Territorial designs and international politics: the diverging constitution of space and boundaries. Territory, Politics, Governance. The debate about the role and direction of territory and

Theories of War and Peace

The course on 'Theories of War and Peace' is the logical continuation of the course 'International Relations Theories. An Introduction'. As such it presupposes that students master the general

Producing Goods and Projecting Power: How What You Make Influences What You Take

How does a state’s source of wealth condition the domain in which it seeks to project influence? We argue that what a state makes conditions what they take. Specifically, the less states rely on land

References

SHOWING 1-10 OF 49 REFERENCES

Bordering on Peace: Democracy, Territorial Issues, and Conflict

I argue that democracy and peace are both symptoms—not causes—of the removal of territorial issues between neighbors, and in this sense the “empirical law” of democratic peace may in fact be

Settled Borders and Regime Type: Democratic Transitions as Consequences of Peaceful Territorial Transfers

Research arguing that external threats determine regime type has generally failed to provide systematic evidence in favor of the peace-to-democracy hypothesis. We suspect that the lack of

Dangerous neighbours, regional territorial conflict and the democratic peace

The likelihood of conflict and the observation of joint democracy tend to cluster regionally. This article tests the argument that these clusters can be explained by regional variations in the

Democracy and the Peaceful Settlement of International Conflict.

The research reported here develops an explanation for the often-noted absence of international war between democratic states. This explanation is derived from a theoretical rationale centered on

Democracies, Territory, and Negotiated Compromises

Multiple studies have confirmed that democracies are more likely than other regime types to resolve their militarized disputes through negotiation and compromise. We argue that these findings have

Territorial Peace and Democratic Clustering

A consistent and robust finding in the democratic peace literature is that democracies tend to cluster together. The explanations for clustering rely on several factors, including democratic

Beyond Territorial Contiguity: Issues at Stake in Democratic Militarized Interstate Disputes

Scholars of international politics have been slow to address the fundamental issues that ground interstate conflict. Territory has frequently been cited as a primary source of contention among

Democratization and International Border Agreements

Does the removal of salient external threats foster democratization? Recent research proposes an affirmative answer but either fails to examine democratization at the monadic level, to consider

Political Tolerance and Territorial Threat: A Cross-National Study

The Steps-to-War theory of international conflict argues that territorial issues are more salient than other issues domestically. However, the evidence for this conclusion almost always rests with

All International Politics is Local: The Diffusion of Conflict, Integration, and Democratization

How does regional interdependence influence the prospects for conflict, integration, and democratization? Some researchers look at the international system at large and disregard the enormous