Contestable Black Boxes

@inproceedings{Tubella2020ContestableBB,
  title={Contestable Black Boxes},
  author={Andrea Aler Tubella and Andreas Theodorou and V. Dignum and Loizos Michael},
  booktitle={RuleML+RR},
  year={2020}
}
The right to contest a decision with consequences on individuals or the society is a well-established democratic right. Despite this right also being explicitly included in GDPR in reference to automated decision-making, its study seems to have received much less attention in the AI literature compared, for example, to the right for explanation. This paper investigates the type of assurances that are needed in the contesting process when algorithmic black-boxes are involved, opening new… Expand
1 Citations
Conceptualising Contestability
  • PDF

References

SHOWING 1-10 OF 19 REFERENCES
Explanation in Artificial Intelligence: Insights from the Social Sciences
  • 1,059
  • PDF
How Society Can Maintain Human-Centric Artificial Intelligence
  • 16
  • PDF
ODRL Policy Modelling and Compliance Checking
  • 13
  • PDF
Responsible Artificial Intelligence: How to Develop and Use AI in a Responsible Way
  • V. Dignum
  • Computer Science
  • Artificial Intelligence: Foundations, Theory, and Algorithms
  • 2019
  • 49
Bundeskartellamt: No proceeding against Lufthansa for abusive pricing
  • 2018
No proceeding against Lufthansa for abusive pricing
  • Tech. rep., Bonn, Germany
  • 2018
The fallacy of inscrutability
  • Joshua A. Kroll
  • Sociology, Medicine
  • Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences
  • 2018
  • 31
Automated multi-level governance compliance checking
  • 10
  • PDF
Counterfactual Explanations Without Opening the Black Box: Automated Decisions and the GDPR
  • 535
  • PDF
Semantic Business Process Regulatory Compliance Checking Using LegalRuleML
  • 22
  • PDF
...
1
2
...