Contemplating failure: The importance of unconscious omission

@article{Smith1990ContemplatingFT,
  title={Contemplating failure: The importance of unconscious omission},
  author={Patricia Gannon Smith},
  journal={Philosophical Studies},
  year={1990},
  volume={59},
  pages={159-176}
}
  • P. G. Smith
  • Published 1 June 1990
  • Philosophy
  • Philosophical Studies
Reasonable expectations, moral responsibility, and empirical data
Many philosophers think that a necessary condition on moral blameworthiness is that the wrongdoer can reasonably be expected to avoid the action for which she is blamed. Those who think so assume as
Knowledge of consequences: an explanation of the epistemic side-effect effect
TLDR
It is argued that when people attribute knowledge in morally negative cases, they express a consequence-knowledge claim rather than a predictive claim, which can explain the persistence of ESEE in the so-called slight-chance of harm conditions.
The Omissions Account of the Knobe Effect and the Asymmetry Challenge
The characteristic asymmetry in intentionality attributions that is known as the Knobe effect can be explained by conjoining an orthodox theory of intentional action with a normative account of
Rozwiązanie problemu Butlera i wyjaśnienie efektu Knobe’a
Butler's and Knobe's cases appear to show that our attributions of intentional actions are sensitive to moral considerations. The puzzles can be solved if (a) we reject the assumption that the
The Social Re-Construction of Agency
  • K. Paprzycka
  • Philosophy
    New Directions in the Philosophy of Science
  • 2014
TLDR
It is pointed out how the concept of action is misconstrued as mental by the predominant intentionalist approach in philosophy of action in response to responsibilism.
When an Action is an Intentional Omission
TLDR
The normative theory of intentional omissions is used to argue that ordinary uses of ‘ s intentionally’ are systematically ambiguous and can explain a number of puzzles about the concept of intentional action.
Omissions, Absences and Causation
Many philosophers believe that the omission of an act or that the absence of a cause can be causally efficacious; that they can genuinely produce effects or be the result of a cause. I think this
CAN A SPASM CAUSE AN ACTION? AN ARGUMENT FOR RESPONSIBILIST THEORIES OF ACTION
According to causalism, actions are events caused in the right way by appropriate mental states. According to responsibilism, attributions of actions are attributions of responsibility. e notion of
The Moral Significance of Unintentional Omission: Comparing Will-Centered and Non-will-centered Accounts of Moral Responsibility
It is reasonable to assume that much wrongdoing for which agents are generally thought blameworthy occurs by way of unintentional omission. In this paper, I explain why certain will-centered accounts
Refraining, Omitting, and Negative Acts
Action theory has been primarily concerned with the question of what it is to do something, along with such subsidiary questions as what is to do something intentionally and what it is to do one
...
...