• Corpus ID: 27095635

Consumer Sovereignty: A Unified Theory of Antitrust and Consumer Protection Law

@inproceedings{Lande1997ConsumerSA,
  title={Consumer Sovereignty: A Unified Theory of Antitrust and Consumer Protection Law},
  author={Robert H. Lande and Neil W. Averitt},
  year={1997}
}
This article is about the relationship between antitrust and consumer protection law. Its purpose is to define each area of law, to delineate the boundary between them, to show how they interact with each other, and to show how they ultimately support one another as the two component parts of an overarching unity: effective consumer choice (also called consumer sovereignty).Consumer choice only is effective when two fundamental conditions are present. There must be a range of consumer options… 
Interpreting Convergence: Where Antitrust Meets Consumer Law
The core of both consumer and antitrust law is or should be consumer welfare.1 Few, albeit authoritative, academic writers have dealt with the subject, and most (beginning with the field’s
Differential Evolution of Consumer Sovereignty Under Deregulatory Policies: How the U.S. Is Lagging International Developments
Antitrust and consumer protection laws share a common purpose to facilitate the exercise of effective consumer choice. This article uses this concept of consumer sovereignty to frame analysis of the
The Contrasting Approaches to Power of the Modern State and the Antitrust Laws: Lessons for Platform Regulation
If the state is a force monopolist, as Max Weber famously claimed, then the law is a kind of antitrust policy, with criminal law securing the state’s monopoly on force and constitutional law
Measuring Monopsony: Using the Antitrust Toolbox to Protect Market Competition and Help the Television Consumer
TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION I. CABLE'S REGULATORY TRADITION: MEASURING COMPETITION MARKET-TO-MARKET A. Cable as a Natural Monopoly 1. Efficiency: The Cheapest Good for the Greatest Number 2.
The Impact of Consumer Protection on Competition and Competition Law: The Case of Deregulated Markets
This paper deals with the question what the relationship is between consumer activity and non-competitive market outcomes in deregulated markets. These market failures could be the result of bad
Consumer Sovereignty: Redrawing the Boundaries between Industry-Specific and General Business Legal Regimes for Telecommunications and Broadband Access Services
Deregulatory telecommunications policies are shifting the boundaries between the traditional industry-specific and general business legal regimes. This paper uses consumer sovereignty, as described
Antitrust, Dominant Firms, and Public Policy Problems: A Framework for Maximizing Success by Minimizing Uncertainty
This first of two reports in a series creates a general framework for policymakers to assess potential outcomes when combating dominant-firm behavior using federal antitrust litigation under existing
The implications of adopting the model of complete harmonization (a case study)
Significant difficulties in the practical application of the transposed legislation appear in the model of complete harmonization. They cover both the more precisely-defined scope of the Directive on
Limiting Product Choice: Innovation, Market Evolution, and Antitrust
1. Fighting brands RD Weller 2001, pp. 879–80). This focus is contrary to that of economists who have long argued that consumer welfare is advanced most directly by innovation and technological
...
1
2
3
4
5
...

References

SHOWING 1-8 OF 8 REFERENCES
Labeling and Advertising of Home Insulation, 16 C
  • F.R. §
  • 1996
Personal Protective Armor Ass'n, 59 Fed
  • Reg
  • 1994
The FTC Act was amended to provide special, specific rulemaking procedures for use "with respect to unfair or deceptive acts or practices
  • 1994
Some exceptions exist for those relatively rare events that violate the FTC Act but not the Sherman or Clayton Acts. See Neil W. Averitt, The Meaning of "Unfair Methods of Competition
  • 1980
) (finding violations on price fixing and other per se theories, but dismissing for insufficient proof the charges involving nonprice restraints judged under the rule of reason; stating
  • see International Ass'n of Conference Interpreters, Dkt. No. 9270, slip op
Disclosure Requirements and Prohibitions Concerning Franchising and Business Opportunity Ventures
Sellers with market power also may lessen competition on dimensions other than price, such as product quality, service, or innovation