Constructing the Myth of the Copenhagen Interpretation

@article{Camilleri2009ConstructingTM,
  title={Constructing the Myth of the Copenhagen Interpretation},
  author={Kristian Camilleri},
  journal={Perspectives on Science},
  year={2009},
  volume={17},
  pages={26-57}
}
According to the standard view, the so-called Copenhagen interpretation of quantum mechanics originated in discussions between Bohr and Heisenberg in 1927, and was defended by Bohr in his classic debate with Einstein. Yet recent scholarship has shown Bohr's views were never widely accepted, let alone properly understood, by his contemporaries, many of whom held divergent views of the Copenhagen orthodoxy. This paper examines how the myth of the Copenhagen interpretation was constructed by… 

The origin of the Everettian heresy $

In 1956, Hugh Everett, then a PhD student at Princeton, proposed his ‘‘relative state’’ formulation of quantum mechanics. John Wheeler, who was Everett’s advisor, recognized the originality and

the Atom of Schrödinger

The central role of Schrodinger in the birth of Quantum Mechanics is widely acknowledged by the official historical accounts. However, his refusal of the main stream in theoretical physics once the

‘Dialectical materialism and modern physics’, an unpublished text by Max Born

A previously unpublished manuscript by the physicist Max Born, one of the creators of quantum mechanics, is presented. The manuscript was addressed to Born's colleague Léon Rosenfeld and criticized

Bohr’s Complementarity and Kant’s Epistemology

We point out and analyze some striking analogies between Kant’s transcendental method in philosophy and Bohr’s approach of the fundamental issues raised by quantum mechanics. We argue in particular

Quantum states are equivalence classes of stable information, not density operators

The Copenhagen interpretation of quantum mechanics, which first took shape in Bohr's landmark 1928 paper on complementarity, remains an enigma. Although many physicists are skeptical about the

References

SHOWING 1-10 OF 177 REFERENCES

Who Invented the “Copenhagen Interpretation”? A Study in Mythology

What is commonly known as the Copenhagen interpretation of quantum mechanics, regarded as representing a unitary Copenhagen point of view, differs significantly from Bohr’s complementarity

Copenhagen Interpretation of Quantum Theory

The theoretical and experimental context within which the “Copenhagen Interpretation” of quantum theory was generated is underemphasized by recent critics of the Bohr-Heisenberg philosophy. When an

Bohr, Heisenberg and the divergent views of complementarity

Science and exile: David Bohm, the cold war, and a new interpretation of quantum mechanics

ABSTRACT In the early 1950s the American physicist David Bohm (1917-1992) produced a new interpretation of quantum mechanics and had to flee from McCarthyism. Rejected at Princeton, he moved to Saao

Five Cautions for the Copenhagen Interpretation's Critics

Within the past decade there has grown an acute and highly articulate group of critics of the orthodox interpretation of quantum theory,--the so-called "Copenhagen Interpretation." The writings of

Science and exile: David Bohm, the hot times of the Cold War, and his struggle for a new interpretation of quantum mechanics

This article focuses on the reception among physicists of Bohm's 1952 papers on the causal interpretation of quantum mechanics, which were poorly received at the time. I describe his Brazilian exile

The Description of Nature: Niels Bohr and the Philosophy of Quantum Physics

Niels Bohr, the founding father of modern atomic physics and quantum theory, was as original a philosopher as he was a physicist. This study explores several dimensions of Bohr's vision: the

Heisenberg and the Transformation of Kantian Philosophy

In this paper, I argue that Heisenberg's mature philosophy of quantum mechanics must be understood in the context of his epistemological project to reinterpret and redefine Kant's notion of the a

The Bohr-Einstein Dispute

The orthodox view is that Bohr won the dispute with Einstein about the interpretation of quantum mechanics: the verdict, it is held, was reasonable enough in the mid-thirties, and put beyond all
...