Construct Validity: A Universal Validity System or Just Another Test Evaluation Procedure?

@inproceedings{Embretson2007ConstructVA,
  title={Construct Validity: A Universal Validity System or Just Another Test Evaluation Procedure?},
  author={Susan E. Embretson},
  year={2007}
}
Lissitz and Samuelsen (2007) have proposed a framework that seemingly deems construct validity evidence irrelevant to supporting educational test meaning. The author of this article agrees with Lissitz and Samuelsen that internal evidence establishes test meaning, but she argues that construct validity need not be removed from the validity sphere. In fact, she argues that doing so could have an adverse impact on the quality of educational tests. She proposes a universal system for construct… CONTINUE READING

Citations

Publications citing this paper.
SHOWING 1-10 OF 27 CITATIONS

The construct validity of the NEO PI-R personality inventory in high stakes employee selection

VIEW 27 EXCERPTS
CITES BACKGROUND, METHODS & RESULTS
HIGHLY INFLUENCED