Constraints and tensions in testing general relativity from Planck and CFHTLenS data including intrinsic alignment systematics

@article{Dossett2015ConstraintsAT,
  title={Constraints and tensions in testing general relativity from Planck and CFHTLenS data including intrinsic alignment systematics},
  author={Jason Dossett and M. Ishak and D. Parkinson and T. Davis},
  journal={Physical Review D},
  year={2015},
  volume={92},
  pages={023003-1-023003-12}
}
  • Jason Dossett, M. Ishak, +1 author T. Davis
  • Published 2015
  • Physics
  • Physical Review D
  • We present constraints on testing general relativity (GR) at cosmological scales using recent data sets and assess the impact of galaxy intrinsic alignment in the CFHTLenS lensing data on those constraints. We consider data from Planck temperature anisotropies, the galaxy power spectrum from the WiggleZ survey, weak-lensing tomography shear-shear cross-correlations from the CFHTLenS survey, integrated Sachs Wolfe-galaxy cross-correlations, and baryon acoustic oscillation data. We use three… CONTINUE READING
    28 Citations

    Figures and Tables from this paper

    Discrepancies between CFHTLenS cosmic shear and Planck: new physics or systematic effects?
    • 31
    • PDF
    Testing general relativity in cosmology
    • M. Ishak
    • Physics, Medicine
    • Living reviews in relativity
    • 2019
    • 128
    • PDF
    KiDS-450: testing extensions to the standard cosmological model
    • 116
    • Highly Influenced
    • PDF

    References

    SHOWING 1-10 OF 53 REFERENCES
    W
    • J. Percival et al., Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc.401, 2148–2168
    • 2010
    Phys
    • Rev. D.86, 103008
    • 2012
    Phys
    • Rev. D.84, 123001
    • 2011
    Astropart
    • Phys.03
    • 2014
    Phys
    • Rev. D 89, 103530
    • 2014
    Phys
    • Rev. D 90, 103512
    • 2014
    Rev
    • Lett. 112, 051303
    • 2014
    and A
    • Moss,
    • 2014
    Astropart
    • Phys.10
    • 2013
    C
    • Bennett et al., Astrophys. J. Supp.208
    • 2013