Constraints and changes: A survey of abstract argumentation dynamics

@article{Doutre2018ConstraintsAC,
  title={Constraints and changes: A survey of abstract argumentation dynamics},
  author={Sylvie Doutre and Jean-Guy Mailly},
  journal={Argument & Computation},
  year={2018},
  volume={9},
  pages={223-248}
}
argumentation dynamics Sylvie Doutre a,∗ and Jean-Guy Mailly b a IRIT, Université Toulouse 1 Capitole, France E-mail: sylvie.doutre@irit.fr b LIPADE, Université Paris Descartes, France E-mail: jean-guy.mailly@parisdescartes.fr Abstract. This paper addresses the issue of the dynamic enforcement of a constraint in an argumentation system. The system consists in (1) an argumentation framework, made up, notably, of a set of arguments and of an attack relation, (2) an evaluation semantics, and (3… CONTINUE READING

Citations

Publications citing this paper.

References

Publications referenced by this paper.
SHOWING 1-10 OF 64 REFERENCES

What does it take to enforce an argument? Minimal change in abstract argumentation

R. Baumann
  • in: Proceedings of the Twentieth European Conference on Artificial Intelligence (ECAI
  • 2012
VIEW 7 EXCERPTS
HIGHLY INFLUENTIAL

Lagasquie-Schiex, Change in argumentation systems: Exploring the interest of removing an argument

P. Bisquert, C. Cayrol, F. Dupin de Saint-Cyr, M.-C
  • in: Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on Scalable Uncertainty Management (SUM’11),
  • 2011
VIEW 5 EXCERPTS
HIGHLY INFLUENTIAL

A Reasoning Model Based on the Production of Acceptable Arguments

  • Annals of Mathematics and Artificial Intelligence
  • 2002
VIEW 9 EXCERPTS
HIGHLY INFLUENTIAL