Constitutional Origins and Liberal Democracy: A Global Analysis, 1900–2015

  title={Constitutional Origins and Liberal Democracy: A Global Analysis, 1900–2015},
  author={Gabriel L. Negretto and Mariano S{\'a}nchez-Talanquer},
  journal={American Political Science Review},
  pages={522 - 536}
A strong tradition in democratic theory claims that only constitutions made with direct popular involvement can establish or deepen democracy. Against this view, we argue that new constitutions are likely to enhance liberal democracy when they emerge through a plural agreement among political elites with distinct bases of social support. Power dispersion during constitution writing induces the adoption of institutions that protect opposition forces from the arbitrary use of executive power… 
4 Citations

Deepening Democracy? Promises and challenges of Chile’s Road to a New Constitution

As a response to mass mobilizations against the political and social status quo, a multiparty agreement activated a process to replace the constitution in Chile, three decades after the country’s

Social Capital, Institutional Rules, and Constitutional Amendment Rates

Why are some constitutions amended more frequently than others? Despite the importance of this question to political science and legal theory, there is little consensus regarding the forces that

Tinkering with executive term limits: partisan imbalances and institutional legacies in Latin America

ABSTRACT Why are some democratically elected presidents more likely than others to extend or remove their current term limits? This paper argues that the frequency and type of reforms relaxing



Authoritarianism and the Elite Origins of Democracy

This book argues that in terms of institutional design, the allocation of power and privilege, and the lived experiences of citizens, democracy often does not restart the political game after

Safeguarding Democracy: Powersharing and Democratic Survival

Democracy is often fragile, especially in states recovering from civil conflict. To protect emerging democracies, many scholars and practitioners recommend political powersharing institutions, which

When Talk Trumps Text: The Democratizing Effects of Deliberation during Constitution-Making, 1974–2011

Under what circumstances do new constitutions promote democracy? Between 1974 and 2011, the level of democracy increased in 62 countries following the adoption of a new constitution, but decreased or

Being There Is Half the Battle: Group Inclusion, Constitution-Writing, and Democracy

Using an original data set assessing the effect of the 195 new constitutions worldwide over the past 40 years on levels of democracy, this article argues that when popular participation and group

Constituents Before Assembly: Participation, Deliberation, and Representation in the Crafting of New Constitutions

Under what circumstances do new constitutions improve a nation's level of democracy? Between 1974 and 2014, democracy increased in seventy-seven countries following the adoption of a new


  • James Fishkin
  • Law, Political Science
    Social Philosophy and Policy
  • 2010
Abstract This paper examines the potential role of deliberative democracy in constitutional processes of higher law-making, either for the founding of constitutions or for constitutional change. It

Mass Mobilization and Elite Exchange: Democratization Episodes in Italy and Spain

At its dawn, democracy was a social movement, but little attention has been given to social movements in recent (mainly American) theorizations of democratization.1 The reason for this seems to be

Constitutions and Commitment: The Evolution of Institutions Governing Public Choice in Seventeenth-Century England

The article studies the evolution of the constitutional arrangements in seventeenth-century England following the Glorious Revolution of 1688. It focuses on the relationship between institutions and

The Consequences of Popular Participation in Constitutional Choice - Towards A Comparative Analysis

Discourse Ethics and Constitutional Economics are usually perceived as normative ventures. Notwithstanding substantial differences, representatives of both programs can agree on the claim that

Elite Foundations of Liberal Democracy

him to examine in depth the conflicting ideas of nation emerging from independence. He is on even thinner ground when he jumps to suggest that a “collectivistic” concept of nation may be the root of